journal article·2026-02-01Open access

Preferred basis in coupled electron–nuclear dynamics

Junhyeok Bang

AIP Advances· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

Beyond the adiabatic regime, our understanding of quantum dynamics in coupled systems remains limited, and the choice of representation continues to obscure physical interpretation and simulation accuracy. Here, we propose a natural and efficient basis for electron–nuclear dynamics by drawing on the concepts of pointer and preferred states from decoherence theory, adapted to systems where electrons and nuclei interact strongly. Within this framework, we show that (1) the independent dynamics exploited by mixed quantum–classical (MQC) methods are best understood as a manifestation of entanglement viewed in a preferred basis, rather than a consequence of decoherence, and (2) the adiabatic Born–Oppenheimer states satisfy the conditions of an approximate preferred basis. This perspective reconciles widely used approximations with a more fundamental structure of the theory. In effect, we revisit MQC methods through the lens of preferred states, clarifying when they succeed and how they can be improved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Chungbuk National University and Research Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology , Cheongju 28644,

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Information Technology Research Center

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1989 · 61 · 68910.1103/revmodphys.61.689 ↗
2. 2012
3. Ann. Phys. · 1927 · 389 · 45710.1002/andp.19273892002 ↗
4. J. Chem. Phys. · 1990 · 93 · 106110.1063/1.459170 ↗
5. Z. Phys. · 1927 · 45 · 45510.1007/bf01329203 ↗
6. J. Chem. Phys. · 1971 · 55 · 56210.1063/1.1675788 ↗
7. J. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 137 · 22A30110.1063/1.4757762 ↗
8. J. Chem. Phys. · 1999 · 110 · 891910.1063/1.478811 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 115 · 07300110.1103/physrevlett.115.073001 ↗
10. John von Neumann Inst. Comput. · 2006 · 31 · 389
11. J. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 135 · 19110110.1063/1.3663870 ↗
12. Faraday Discuss. · 1998 · 110 · 40710.1039/a801824c ↗
13. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2017 · 13 · 2010.1021/acs.jctc.6b00959 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 26300110.1103/physrevlett.110.263001 ↗
15. Found. Phys. · 1970 · 1 · 6910.1007/bf00708656 ↗
16. Found. Phys. · 1973 · 3 · 10910.1007/bf00708603 ↗
17. Ann. Phys. · 1973 · 76 · 40510.1016/0003-4916(73)90040-7 ↗
18. Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter · 1985 · 59 · 22310.1007/bf01725541 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. D · 1981 · 24 · 151610.1103/physrevd.24.1516 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. D · 1982 · 26 · 186210.1103/physrevd.26.1862 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 82 · 518110.1103/physrevlett.82.5181 ↗
22. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2004 · 76 · 126710.1103/RevModPhys.76.1267 ↗
23. 2007
24. J. Chem. Phys. · 1995 · 103 · 813010.1063/1.470177 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 529410.1103/physrevlett.81.5294 ↗
26. J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 129 · 02411210.1063/1.2948395 ↗
27. J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 07410610.1063/1.3310811 ↗
28. J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 133 · 13411110.1063/1.3489004 ↗
29. J. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 134 · 14410210.1063/1.3575588 ↗
30. J. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 134 · 24411410.1063/1.3603448 ↗
31. J. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 137 · 22A54510.1063/1.4757100 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 99 · 22430110.1103/physrevb.99.224301 ↗
33. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2023 · 19 · 38010.1021/acs.jctc.2c00988 ↗
34. Nat. Phys. · 2009 · 5 · 18110.1038/nphys1202 ↗
35. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 12300210.1103/physrevlett.105.123002 ↗
36. J. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 137 · 22A53010.1063/1.4745836 ↗
37. J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2011 · 44 · 127210.1107/s0021889811038970 ↗