Application of an efficient fluid simulation method based on IBM and AMR in complex fluid–structure interaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Currently, the immersed boundary method (IBM) is widely used in fluid–structure interaction simulations. However, due to the fact that the mesh used in IBM is often fixed, when the motion or deformation range of the object is large, it causes significant waste of computing resources. We combine a fluid simulation method based on IBM and adaptive mesh refinement with a structural solver to form an efficient computational framework suitable for three-dimensional fluid–structure interaction. Three complex fluid–structure interaction cases are tested, including a flapping flag in a free stream, an inverted flag in a free stream, and an elastic wing for hovering motion. The results show that the framework significantly reduces the number of fluid mesh cells compared to fixed mesh cases (with a reduction of more than 60%) while meeting accuracy requirements. Finally, this computational framework was used to simulate the flapping of flexible wings in a butterfly model. Flexible wings are composed of skeletons and membranes. The results indicate that leading-edge vortices are generated on the inner and outer sides of the flexible wing during the downstroke, which increases the lift during the downstroke. However, during the upstroke, the leading-edge vortices and trailing edge vortices of the flexible wing are stronger, thereby increasing the thrust during the upstroke.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University 1 , Xi’an 710072,
National Key Laboratory of Aircraft Configuration Design, Northwestern Polytechnical University 2 , 710072 Xi’an,
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. A numerical and theoretical study of the aerodynamic performance of a hovering rhinoceros beetle (Trypoxylus dichotomus)10.1017/jfm.2019.962 ↗
2. Experimental and computational investigations of flapping wings for nano-air-vehicles10.1080/19942060.2015.1004820 ↗
3. Sharp interface immersed boundary method for simulating three-dimensional swimming fish10.1080/19942060.2020.1724197 ↗
4. Three-dimensional simulation of a self-propelled fish-like body swimming in a channel10.1080/19942060.2018.1453381 ↗
5. An immersed transitional interface finite element method for fluid interacting with rigid/deformable solid10.1080/19942060.2019.1586774 ↗
6. Blood flow through a stenosed left anterior descending coronary artery: Evaluation of loss coefficients in one-dimensional fluid–structure interaction model10.1063/5.0236378 ↗
7. Biotransport in human phonation: Porous vocal fold tissue and fluid–structure interaction10.1063/5.0176258 ↗
8. Structural damping effect on deformation of flexible flapping wing10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.671 ↗
9. Effect of wing flexibility on flight dynamics stability of flapping wing MAVs in forward flight10.1177/1756829316663705 ↗
10. Dynamic fluid-structure coupling method of flexible flapping wing for MAV10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000490 ↗
11. Resonance mechanism of flapping wing based on fluid structure interaction simulation10.1016/j.cja.2024.01.011 ↗
12. A hybrid collision model for the fluid-structure interaction during autonomous underwater vehicle recovery10.1063/5.0273652 ↗
13. Fluid–structure interaction effects on attitude stability of an inflatable aerodecelerator10.1063/5.0272358 ↗
14. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of the aeroelastic response in the flexible outer windshield of a high-speed train considering installation location10.1063/5.0259160 ↗
15. Buzz characteristics under fluid–structure interaction of variable-geometry lip for hypersonic inlet10.2514/1.j063589 ↗
16. Passive feedback control of transonic buffet flow10.1063/1.5087014 ↗
17. Investigation of multiple-equilibrium-points phenomena in transonic flutter of NACA 64A010 airfoil10.2514/1.j061298 ↗
18. Investigating the impact of various operating parameters on blade aeroelasticity and wake characteristics of large-scale wind turbines10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115768 ↗
19. A moving-least-squares immersed boundary method for simulating the fluid-structure interaction of elastic bodies with arbitrary thickness10.1016/j.jcp.2016.08.020 ↗
20. Radial planetary vorticity tilting in the leading-edge vortex of revolving wings10.1063/1.5084967 ↗
21. Immersed boundary methods: Historical perspective and future outlook10.1146/annurev-fluid-120720-022129 ↗
22. Flow patterns around heart valves: A numerical method10.1016/0021-9991(72)90065-4 ↗
23. Numerical simulation of a cylinder in uniform flow: Application of a virtual boundary method10.1006/jcph.1996.0036 ↗
24. An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows10.1016/j.jcp.2005.03.017 ↗
25. Modeling a no-slip flow boundary with an external force-field10.1006/jcph.1993.1081 ↗
26. A versatile sharp interface immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with complex boundaries10.1016/j.jcp.2008.01.028 ↗
27. On the numerical oscillation of the direct-forcing immersed-boundary method for moving boundaries10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.11.015 ↗
28. Three-dimensional simulation of a flapping flag in a uniform flow10.1017/s0022112010000248 ↗
29. Fluid-structure interaction involving large deformations: 3D simulations and applications to biological systems10.1016/j.jcp.2013.10.047 ↗
30. A discrete-forcing immersed boundary method for the fluid-structure interaction of an elastic slender body10.1016/j.jcp.2014.09.028 ↗
31. A ghost-cell immersed boundary method for unified simulations of flow over finite- and zero-thickness moving bodies at large CFL numbers10.1080/19942060.2021.1880971 ↗
32. Coupling performance of tandem flexible inverted flags in a uniform flow10.1017/jfm.2017.875 ↗
33. Dynamic pitching of an elastic rectangular wing in hovering motion10.1017/jfm.2011.543 ↗
34. Flow physics and dynamics of flow-induced pitch oscillations of an airfoil10.1017/jfm.2019.627 ↗
35. Thin and sharp edges bodies-fluid interaction simulation using cut-cell immersed boundary method10.1080/19942060.2019.1652209 ↗
36. A structured adaptive mesh refinement strategy with a sharp interface direct-forcing immersed boundary method for moving boundary problems10.1299/jfst.2021jfst0014 ↗
37. A novel geometry-adaptive Cartesian grid based immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for fluid-structure interactions at moderate and high Reynolds numbers10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.024 ↗
38. An efficient geometry-adaptive mesh refinement framework and its application in the immersed boundary lattice Boltzmann method10.1016/j.cma.2022.114662 ↗
39. D. Demidov , “AMGCL: An efficient, flexible, and extensible algebraic multigrid implementation,” arXiv:1811.05704 (2018).10.1134/S1995080219050056 ↗
40. Effect of forewing sweeping on aerodynamic performance of butterfly like model10.1016/j.cja.2024.103387 ↗
41. G. Dhondt , Calculix CrunchiX user’s manual version 2.20, http://www.calculix.de (accessed 2 January 2025).
42. preCICE - A fully parallel library for multi-physics surface coupling10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.04.003 ↗
43. Flapping dynamics of an inverted flag10.1017/jfm.2013.555 ↗
44. Effect of morphological characteristics on the aerodynamic performance of a flexible flapping butterfly wing10.1063/5.0287527 ↗
45. Decoupling wing-shape effects of wing-swept angle and aspect ratio on a forward-flying butterfly10.1103/physreve.107.065105 ↗