journal article·2026-02-01Open access

A newly designed sensor for characterizing the response behavior of fuzes under fragment impact

Chenyang Fan, Ruisheng Wang, Youcai Xiao, Wenzhong Lou

AIP Advances· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

Considering the limitation that existing experimental and evaluation methods for insensitive munitions are unable to fully satisfy the requirements of quantitatively characterizing and safety assessing different response levels of fuzes, this study developed the strain-type pressure bar sensor to experimentally explore the response characteristics of fuzes with different shell thicknesses under fragment impact. The developed sensor system was used to measure the output pressure corresponding to different response degrees. To further verify the experimental results, numerical simulations were carried out to analyze the response behavior of fuzes under fragment impact. The simulation results under various loading conditions were compared with the output pressures obtained from experiments. The good agreement between the simulation and experimental data validates the accuracy and reliability of the proposed testing methodology and evaluation framework, which allows for the precise measurement of output pressure in insensitive munitions and the quantitative classification of their response levels using the strain-type pressure bar sensor.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Military Defense Systems Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology 1 , Beijing 100081,

Science and Technology on Electromechanical Dynamic Control Laboratory 2 , Xi’an 710000,

College of Mechatronic Engineering, North University of China 3 , Taiyuan 030051,

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Science and Technology on Electromechanical Dynamic Control Laboratory

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Review on advanced energetic materials for insensitive munition formulations10.1134/s0010508220050019 ↗
2. MSIAC – Supporting the insensitive munitions community10.1002/prep.201600104 ↗
3. Insensitive munitions fragment impact Gun testing technology challenges10.1002/prep.201600045 ↗
4. Shock initiation of multi-component insensitive PBX explosives: Experiments and MC-DZK mesoscopic reaction rate model10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.02.028 ↗
5. A constitutive model for the shock ignition of polymer bonded explosives10.1080/00102202.2018.1505880 ↗
6. Research on piezoelectric pressure sensor for shock wave load measurement10.1016/j.isatra.2020.05.018 ↗
7. Microengineering pressure sensor active layers for improved performance10.1002/adfm.202003491 ↗
8. S. A. Sheffield , R. L.Gustavsen, L. G.Hill, “Electromagnetic gauge measurements of shock initiating PBX9501 and PBX9502 explosives,” Report No. LA-UR-98-3826, Los Alamos National Lab, NM, 1998.10.2172/350871 ↗
9. Embedded electromagnetic gauge measurements and modeling of shock initiation in the TATB based explosives LX-17 and PBX 950210.1063/1.1483711 ↗
10. Simulation of slow cook-off for modular charges at different heating rates
11. Numerical simulation of cook-off for explosive at different heating rates
12. Blast waves in free air10.1002/prep.19830080102 ↗
13. A new type of piezoelectric pressure gauge with an amplifier and its application
14. Strain type pressure rod gauge used for measuring blast loading
15. A method of measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of bullets
16. Application of bar gauge in parameters measurement of stress wave in concrete
17. Cook-off experiment on the JH-14C booster explosive with a shell and the relevant numerical simulation
18. Fragment impact modeling and experimental results for insensitive munitions compliance of a 120 mm warhead10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.729 ↗
19. Modeling and experimental fragment impact testing of the XM2510.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.743 ↗
20. Shock initiation of covered flake JH-2 high explosive by simultaneous impact of multiple fragments10.1002/prep.201900366 ↗
21. Critical criterion for the shock initiation/ignition of cylindrical charges with thin aluminum shell impacted by steel fragment10.1002/prep.201700081 ↗
22. Dual fragment impact of PBX charges10.1063/1.5044889 ↗
23. Plane stress wave propagation in solids10.1063/1.1658348 ↗
24. Stress waves in solids10.1016/0022-460x(64)90008-2 ↗
25. Application of traveling wave rod pressure gages in testing of blast impact load
26. Attenuation characteristics of shock waves in drilling and blasting based on viscoelastic wave theory10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105573 ↗
27. Linear and nonlinear waves10.1088/0031-9112/26/11/028 ↗
28. Effect of lot microstructure variations on detonation performance of the triaminotrinitrobenzene (TATB)-based insensitive high explosive PBX 950210.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112373 ↗
29. Shock initiation experiments on the LLM105 explosive RX55AA at 25 °C and 150 °C with ignition and growth modeling10.1063/1.2833275 ↗
30. Phenomenological model of shock initiation in heterogeneous explosives10.1063/1.862940 ↗