journal article·2026-01-01Open access

Velocity updates from machine learning for stable molecular dynamics integration

Guy W. Dayhoff, Sameer Varma

AIP Advances· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

We present a machine-augmented molecular dynamics (MAMD) framework in which particle velocities are updated using predictions from stacked long short-term memory networks trained on historical velocity and coordinate data. MAMD propagates coordinate trajectories in time without access to forces or energies during training or inference. Applied to isolated harmonic diatomics, MAMD conserves total energy, preserves molecular structure, and reproduces velocity autocorrelation functions. Small integration errors can accumulate over long trajectories, but we show that molecular dynamics stability can be recovered through periodic, but infrequent injections of velocity updates computed from Hamiltonian forces (frequency ≤0.01). We also find that the optimal history length for each diatom closely matches the first inflection point of its velocity autocorrelation function, suggesting a link between model architecture and statistical mechanics. These results establish MAMD as a proof-of-concept integration strategy for the isolated harmonic diatomic systems studied here, in which finite velocity memory supports short-horizon predictions and sparse Hamiltonian check-ins provide long-horizon stability. In particular, we show that force-free, velocity-based machine learning updates can be embedded directly into conventional molecular dynamics algorithms while retaining essential physical invariants, providing a physically interpretable basis for hybrid MD/ML integration. Systematic extensions to more complex systems and quantitative performance comparisons in regimes with expensive force evaluations (e.g., ab initio molecular dynamics) are left for future work.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Quantum many-body systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, University of South Florida 1 , Tampa, Florida 33620,

Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of South Florida 2 , Tampa, Florida 33620,

Department of Physics, University of South Florida 3 , Tampa, Florida 33620,

Funding

National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 2001
2. Recent advances in first-principles based molecular dynamics10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00503 ↗
3. Nuclear quantum effects enter the mainstream10.1038/s41570-017-0109 ↗
4. Machine learning of reactive potentials10.1146/annurev-physchem-062123-024417 ↗
5. Perspective: Atomistic simulations of water and aqueous systems with machine learning potentials10.1063/5.0201241 ↗
6. Machine learning heralding a new development phase in molecular dynamics simulations10.1007/s10462-024-10731-4 ↗
7. Accelerated atomic data production in ab initio molecular dynamics with recurrent neural network for materials research10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c01944 ↗
8. Artificial neural networks as propagators in quantum dynamics10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03117 ↗
9. Solving Newton’s equations of motion with large timesteps using recurrent neural networks based operators10.1088/2632-2153/ac5f60 ↗
10. High-fidelity molecular dynamics trajectory reconstruction with bi-directional neural networks10.1088/2632-2153/ac6ec6 ↗
11. Four-dimensional-spacetime atomistic artificial intelligence models10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c01592 ↗
12. F. Bigi , S.Chong, A.Kristiadi, and M.Ceriotti, “FlashMD: Long-stride, universal prediction of molecular dynamics,” arXiv:2505.19350 (2025).
13. T. Zheng , W.Gao, and C.Wang, “Learning large-time-step molecular dynamics with graph neural networks,” arXiv:2111.15176 (2021).
14. Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics10.1063/1.463137 ↗
15. Molecular dynamics with multiple time scales: The selection of efficient reference system propagators10.1063/1.472005 ↗
16. Construction of higher order symplectic integrators10.1016/0375-9601(90)90092-3 ↗
17. Symplectic integrators: An introduction10.1119/1.2034523 ↗
18. Practical construction of modified Hamiltonians10.1137/s106482750138318x ↗
19. Shadow hybrid Monte Carlo: An efficient propagator in phase space of macromolecules10.1016/j.jcp.2004.04.016 ↗
20. A separable shadow Hamiltonian hybrid Monte Carlo method10.1063/1.3253687 ↗
21. F. Bigi , M.Langer, and M.Ceriotti, “The dark side of the forces: Assessing non-conservative force models for atomistic machine learning,” arXiv:2412.11569 (2024).
22. 2013
23. 1999
24. 2020
25. GROMACS-a parallel computer for molecular-dynamics simulations
26. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 ↗
27. Quiet high-resolution computer models of a plasma10.1016/0021-9991(74)90010-2 ↗
28. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling10.1063/1.2408420 ↗
29. M. Abadi , A.Agarwal, P.Barham, E.Brevdo, Z.Chen, CraigC., G. S.Corrado, A.Davis, J.Dean, M.Devin, , “TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems,” arXiv:1603.04467 (2016).
30. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks
31. A. M. Saxe , J. L.McClelland, and S.Ganguli, “Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networks,” arXiv:1312.6120 (2013).
32. P. K. Diederik and B. A.Jimmy, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).