Simulations of plasma current induced by toroidal field ramping down on tokamaks
Source abstract
Abstract
In tokamak experiments, the BT ramping down can drive off-axis and parallel inductive current. This approach leads to a decrease in q95 and an increase in normalized beta, βN. The off-axis inductive current also broadens the current profile. Typically, the 1.5D transport code is used to simulate the time evolution of the plasma current profile, which is based on the flux-surface-averaged Faraday’s law. The ONETWO code is one of those transport codes. However, this code cannot simulate the situation of the evolving toroidal field BT. This article proposes a new time-dependent model to take into account the BT ramping down situation. A modified formula of flux-surface-averaged Faraday’s law was derived to consider the effect of the BT ramping rate on the current evolution, and it was implemented in the ONETWO code. Then, the modified ONETWO code was used to simulate the BT ramping down experiment on DIII-D. The simulation result of the plasma current evolution with BT ramping down shows a broader current profile with smaller ohmic current induced by the poloidal field, compared to that without BT ramping down.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Superconducting Materials and Applications · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Plasma Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Science 1 , Hefei 230031,
University of Science and Technology of China 2 , Hefei 230026,
Shenzhen University 3 , Shenzhen 518060,
General Atomics (GA) 4 , P.O. Box 85608, San Diego, California 92121,
Funding
Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Science · National Key Research and Development Program of China · U.S. Department of Energy
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Plasmas · 2006 · 13 · 02230510.1063/1.2169804 ↗
2. Nucl. Fusion · 2015 · 55 · 12302510.1088/0029-5515/55/12/123025 ↗
3. Nucl. Fusion · 2018 · 58 · 11500110.1088/1741-4326/aac4b7 ↗
4. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2004 · 46 · B2310.1088/0741-3335/46/12b/003 ↗
5. Nucl. Fusion · 2004 · 44 · R110.1088/0029-5515/44/4/r01 ↗
6. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2001 · 43 · 86110.1088/0741-3335/43/7/303 ↗
7. 2009 · 313
8. Nucl. Fusion · 2006 · 46 · S64510.1088/0029-5515/46/8/s10 ↗
9. Nucl. Fusion · 2001 · 41 · 131110.1088/0029-5515/41/10/302 ↗
10. Nucl. Fusion · 2001 · 41 · 86510.1088/0029-5515/41/7/307 ↗
11. Nucl. Fusion · 2023 · 63 · 01600810.1088/1741-4326/aca10b ↗
12. Nucl. Fusion · 2020 · 60 · 12200110.1088/1741-4326/abb146 ↗
13. Phys. Lett. A · 2023 · 462 · 12864610.1016/j.physleta.2023.128646 ↗
14. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2024 · 66 · 11500610.1088/1361-6587/ad797e ↗
15. Phys. Plasmas · 2006 · 13 · 05611010.1063/1.2185010 ↗
16. Nucl. Fusion · 2020 · 60 · 04602510.1088/1741-4326/ab74a0 ↗
17. Nucl. Fusion · 1999 · 39 · 217510.1088/0029-5515/39/12/302 ↗
18. Nucl. Fusion · 1990 · 30 · 199910.1088/0029-5515/30/10/001 ↗
19. Nucl. Fusion · 2020 · 60 · 12600710.1088/1741-4326/abaf33 ↗
20. W. W. Pfeiffer , R. H.Davidson, R. L.Miller, and R. E.Waltz, General Atomics Company Report GA-A16178, 1980.
21. H. St. John , T. S.Taylor, Y. R.Lin-Liu, and A. D.Turnbull, General Atomics Company Report GA-A21847, 1994.
22. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1976 · 48 · 23910.1103/revmodphys.48.239 ↗
23. G. Pereverzev and P. N.Yushmanov, Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik IPP 5/98 (2002).
24. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2017 · 59 · 12400410.1088/1361-6587/aa857e ↗
25. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2025 · 312 · 10961110.1016/j.cpc.2025.109611 ↗
26. Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 48 · 96810.13182/fst48-968 ↗
27. Coppi · 1981 · 19
28. Nucl. Fusion · 2015 · 55 · 08300810.1088/0029-5515/55/8/083008 ↗
29. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2013 · 55 · 12500810.1088/0741-3335/55/12/125008 ↗