Charge transport behavior at donor/acceptor interface aimed at high electrical conductivity with suppressed activation energy
Source abstract
Abstract
This study focuses on the donor–acceptor interface composed of 4,4′,4″-tris[phenyl(m-tolyl) amino]triphenylamine (m-MTDATA) and copper(II) 1,2,3,4,8,9,10,11,15,16,17,18,22,23,24,25-hexadecafluoro-29H,31H-phthalocyanine (F16CuPc) layers. Due to the charge transfer characteristics at the interface of the m-MTDATA (30 nm)/F16CuPc (30 nm) layers, a high electrical conductivity as high as 10−4 S cm−1 was achieved. Our findings indicate that the dominant current transport layer originates from F16CuPc with a CT depth of ∼3 nm from the donor–acceptor interface. Furthermore, the formation of dual interfaces of donor–acceptor–donor layers, i.e., m-MTDATA (30 nm)/F16CuPc (5 nm)/m-MTDATA (30 nm), appreciably reduced the activation energy for charge transport, i.e., Ea = 0.183 eV in the three-layer structure and Ea = 0.239 eV in the two-layer structure, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Organic Photonics and Electronics Research (OPERA), Kyushu University 1 , 744, Motooka, Nishi, Fukuoka 819-0395,
Institut Parisien de Chimie Moléculaire (IPCM) - UMR 8232, CNRS, Sorbonne Université 2 , F-75005 Paris,
International Institute for Carbon Neutral Energy Research (I2CNER), Kyushu University 3 , 744 Motooka, Nishi, Fukuoka 819-0395,
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · Center National de la Recherche Scientifique
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Org. Electron. · 2013 · 14 · 127110.1016/j.orgel.2013.02.024 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 06330510.1063/1.3081409 ↗
3. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 1219310.1039/c8cp01253a ↗
4. Org. Electron. · 2010 · 11 · 139910.1016/j.orgel.2010.06.004 ↗
5. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2022 · 14 · 4463210.1021/acsami.2c09168 ↗
6. J. Mater. Chem. C · 2022 · 10 · 731910.1039/d2tc00655c ↗
7. J. Mater. Chem. C · 2020 · 8 · 1647010.1039/d0tc02828b ↗
8. RSC Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 159310.1039/C7RA11912G ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 1972 · 5 · 95210.1103/physrevb.5.952 ↗
10. Nat. Mater. · 2008 · 7 · 52010.1038/nmat2211 ↗
11. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 1975 · 39 · 114310.1143/jpsj.39.1143 ↗
12. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 2007 · 76 · 03370110.1143/jpsj.76.033701 ↗
13. Nat. Mater. · 2008 · 7 · 57410.1038/nmat2205 ↗
14. Org. Electron. · 2017 · 48 · 37110.1016/j.orgel.2017.06.018 ↗
15. Org. Electron. · 2010 · 11 · 21210.1016/j.orgel.2009.10.018 ↗
16. Chem. Commun. · 2010 · 46 · 513310.1039/c0cc00955e ↗
17. Adv. Mater. · 2023 · 35 · 220551710.1002/adma.202205517 ↗
18. Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 78810.1038/nmat3383 ↗
19. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2016 · 26 · 233410.1002/adfm.201502082 ↗
20. Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 3 · 150086310.1002/admi.201500863 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 11450210.1063/1.3137192 ↗
22. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2014 · 578168
23. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. · 2006 · 455 · 25910.1080/15421400600698667 ↗
24. Adv. Mater. · 2024 · 36 · 240015810.1002/adma.202400158 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1967 · 11 · 18310.1063/1.1755088 ↗
26. Chem. Lett. · 2006 · 18 · 114510.1246/cl.1989.1145 ↗
27. J. Mater. Chem. · 2011 · 21 · 581210.1039/c0jm03411h ↗
28. Synth. Met. · 2021 · 278 · 11683510.1016/j.synthmet.2021.116835 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 1296410.1103/PhysRevB.57.12964 ↗