Stability analysis of 3D cubic-quintic Gross–Pitaevskii equation with elastic and inelastic collisions
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, we study the stability of three-dimensional Bose–Einstein condensates of finite temperatures at which both elastic and inelastic collisions are taken into account. The modeled governing Gross–Pitaevskii equation reveals inclusion of both real and imaginary components in the nonlinear terms. We find the stability region for a wide range of two- and three-body interaction terms with the inclusion of both gain and loss effects by using the Jacobian matrix. We investigate the stability of the system for possible different states of those cases. The stability properties of three-dimensional condensates are strongly altered by tuning the gain rate of their elastic collisions. These strong losses impose severe limitations for using Feshbach resonances. We finally sustain our semi-analytical findings with the results of inclusive numerical simulations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Nonlinear Photonic Systems · Strong Light-Matter Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Presidency College (Autonomous) 1 , Chennai 600005,
Laboratory of Pure Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Douala 2 , P.O. Box 24157, Douala,
Instituto de Física Teórica, UNESP–Universidade Estadual Paulista 3 , São Paulo, SP 01140-070,
Funding
Foundation for Research Support of the State of Sao Paulo
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Science · 1995 · 269 · 19810.1126/science.269.5221.198 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 75 · 168710.1103/physrevlett.75.1687 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 75 · 396910.1103/physrevlett.75.3969 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. E · 2014 · 89 · 05291710.1103/physreve.89.052917 ↗
5. Chaos, Solitons Fractals · 2017 · 103 · 23210.1016/j.chaos.2017.06.008 ↗
6. Phys. Scr. · 2020 · 95 · 11580410.1088/1402-4896/abbd6a ↗
7. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. · 2000 · 33 · 405310.1088/0953-4075/33/19/316 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. A · 2001 · 64 · 04360610.1103/physreva.64.043606 ↗
9. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. · 2008 · 41 · 22540310.1088/0953-4075/41/22/225403 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 121510.1103/physrevlett.78.1215 ↗
11. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 2020 · 37 · A5410.1364/JOSAB.395007 ↗
12. Int. J. Theor. Phys. · 2022 · 61 · 22210.1007/s10773-022-05204-9 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. A · 1998 · 57 · 383710.1103/PhysRevA.57.3837 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. A · 2010 · 81 · 02361010.1103/physreva.81.023610 ↗
15. Phys. Lett. A · 2024 · 511 · 12956310.1016/j.physleta.2024.129563 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 82 · 242210.1103/physrevlett.82.2422 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 98510.1103/physrevlett.78.985 ↗
18. Front. Phys. · 2022 · 17 · 4250110.1007/s11467-021-1134-1 ↗
19. Chaos, Solitons Fractals · 2023 · 173 · 11359710.1016/j.chaos.2023.113597 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. A · 2007 · 75 · 01362410.1103/physreva.75.013624 ↗
21. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. · 2008 · 41 · 20520210.1088/0953-4075/41/20/205202 ↗
22. Ann. Phys. · 2011 · 326 · 235610.1016/j.aop.2011.05.006 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. E · 2001 · 65 · 01670310.1103/physreve.65.016703 ↗
24. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 2002 · 19 · 53710.1364/josab.19.000537 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 04040310.1103/physrevlett.90.040403 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. A · 2001 · 63 · 04360410.1103/physreva.63.043604 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 23390310.1103/physrevlett.102.233903 ↗
28. Opt. Lett. · 2010 · 35 · 143710.1364/ol.35.001437 ↗
29. Opt. Lett. · 2010 · 35 · 265110.1364/ol.35.002651 ↗
30. Ann. Phys. · 2011 · 326 · 64510.1016/j.aop.2010.11.005 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. A · 2010 · 81 · 02560410.1103/physreva.81.025604 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. A · 2010 · 81 · 061805(R)10.1103/physreva.81.061805 ↗
33. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 12530210.1088/0953-4075/43/12/125302 ↗
34. Phys. Lett. A · 2013 · 377 · 240810.1016/j.physleta.2013.07.005 ↗
35. Chaos, Solitons Fractals · 2015 · 76 · 11110.1016/j.chaos.2015.03.015 ↗
36. Phys. Lett. A · 2015 · 379 · 29910.1016/j.physleta.2013.12.047 ↗
37. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. · 2018 · 51 · 16520210.1088/1361-6455/aad038 ↗
38. Physica E · 2019 · 107 · 5410.1016/j.physe.2018.11.026 ↗
39. Comput. Theor. Chem. · 2020 · 1190 · 11298210.1016/j.comptc.2020.112982 ↗
40. Phys. Lett. A · 2021 · 418 · 12769610.1016/j.physleta.2021.127696 ↗
41. Appl. Sci. · 2022 · 12 · 113510.3390/app12031135 ↗
42. Phys. Rev. B · 2022 · 105 · 22431510.1103/physrevb.105.224315 ↗
43. Phys. Lett. A · 2023 · 480 · 12898710.1016/j.physleta.2023.128987 ↗
44. Phys. Rev. E · 2018 · 98 · 04220310.1103/physreve.98.042203 ↗
45. Eur. Phys. J. D · 2018 · 72 · 4810.1140/epjd/e2018-80354-2 ↗
46. Phys. Rev. E · 2001 · 64 · 01660810.1103/physreve.64.016608 ↗
47. Opt. Commun. · 2005 · 244 · 37710.1016/j.optcom.2004.09.022 ↗
48. Phys. Rev. E · 2009 · 79 · 02660910.1103/PhysRevE.79.026609 ↗
49. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 13430110.1103/physrevb.79.134301 ↗
50. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2009 · 180 · 188810.1016/j.cpc.2009.04.015 ↗
51. Phys. Rev. A · 2009 · 80 · 04362510.1103/physreva.80.043625 ↗
52. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2009 · 81 · 64710.1103/revmodphys.81.647 ↗
53. Phys. Lett. A · 2019 · 383 · 203310.1016/j.physleta.2019.03.042 ↗
54. Phys. Rev. E · 2019 · 99 · 03220210.1103/PhysRevE.99.032202 ↗