Impact of mechanical tolerances on partial turn skipping in helical flux compression generator
Source abstract
Abstract
Maintaining tight mechanical tolerances of the components used in helical flux compression generators is crucial for optimizing device performance. Moving beyond current literature, which provides various approximations for acceptable tolerances, a 3D simulation of the armature stator interaction during generator operation was developed, revealing that existing equations frequently misestimate the tolerance limits. Without restricting the generality of the presented approach, the focus was primarily on the armature’s concentricity and roundness, comparing the acceptable tolerance limits between generators of different sizes. An analytical approach for select geometries was developed, confirming the 3D results. Quantitative results reveal that a steeper Gurney angle and increased winding pitch allow for less restrictive tolerances for eccentricity and ellipticity. Even small deviations from the ideal armature positioning and shape will result in fluctuations of the output current time-derivative, observed experimentally and in simulation. Larger deviations then cause partial turn skipping, associated with loss of magnetic flux. The simulation elucidates the impact of tolerance deviations on generator performance by offering precise tolerance ranges for various generator sizes, thereby facilitating informed design decisions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Texas Tech University 1 , 2500 Broadway W, Lubbock, Texas 79409,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2 , 7000 East Ave., Livermore, California 94550,
Funding
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Helical explosive flux compression generator research at the Air Force research laboratory
2. Criteria for prevention of armature ‘turn-skipping’
3. Design of a high-gain flux-compression generator
4. Magnetic flux cutoffs in helical explosive magnetic generators
5. Analysis of armature/stator contact
6. Design criteria for prevention of armature ‘turn-skipping’ in helical magnetic flux compression generators
7. Modeling of a small helical magnetic flux-compression generator10.1109/TPS.2008.2003077 ↗
8. Calculation of turn skipping losses in helical flux compression generators10.1109/TPS.2011.2175752 ↗
9. Armature dynamics of helical magnetic flux-compression generators
10. Armature dynamics
11. Benchmarking the suitability of NovecTM 4710 for application in flux compression generators10.1109/TPS.2024.3382475 ↗
12. Modeling and simulation of simple flux-trapping FCGs utilizing PSpice software10.1109/TPS.2010.2048723 ↗
13. Absolute formulae for the mutual inductance of coaxial solenoids10.1103/physrevseriesi.31.617 ↗
14. The Gurney model of explosive output for driving metal10.1007/978-1-4612-0589-0_7 ↗
15. An armature-stator contact resistance model for explosively driven helical magnetic flux compression generators
16. Gurney energy of explosives: Estimation of the velocity and impulse imparted to driven metals
17. 2015 · 270
18. Explosive-driven energy generators with transformer coupling10.1088/0022-3735/12/5/021 ↗
19. The calculation of cutoffs of magnetic flux in misaligned, helical, explosive-driven magnetic flux-compression generators
20. Explosive-driven magnetic-field compression generators10.1063/1.1656496 ↗
21. N. Fryar , “Comparative analysis of gas insulation within a simulated helical flux compression generator geometry using air, SF6, and Novec 4710,” 2024; available at https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/2375950.
22. Blender Foundation, Blender 4.0 (Computer software), 2024; available at https://www.blender.org.
23. Python Software Foundation, Python Language Reference, version 3.11.7 (Online), available at https://www.python.org.2024.10.1007/978-3-031-54680-8_2 ↗