journal article·2024-10-01Open access

Numerical optimization of nano-sized SQUID-on-tip characteristics

Abul Hasnat Rubel

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 10

Abstract

SQUID-on-tip (SOT) is the most sensitive magnetometry device to date, designed as a superconducting loop at the apex of a scanning tip with nearly vertical biasing leads. Here we examine the static and dynamic properties of such a SOT as a function of the 3D geometric features of the device as close as in reality, using state-of-the-art (Ginzburg–Landau) GL simulations. We find that the gradient of the phase of the order parameter in the perimeter of the loop, which relates to the screening current in response to the magnetic field, is primarily enhanced in a SOT with narrow loop arms. This decreases the critical current of the device but makes the critical current less sensitive to the penetrating field, which is beneficial for the device’s sensitivity at a constant biasing current in a broader field range. We further show how constriction in the arms of the loop can further enhance the sensitivity. Taken together, our results offer engineering solutions for the tailored performance of SOT devices in desired conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, University of Antwerp , Antwerp, and , Dhaka,

Department of Physics, Jagannath University , Antwerp, and , Dhaka,

Funding

ERASMUS MUNDUS

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 2007 · 17 · 69910.1109/TASC.2007.897403 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 13441710.1103/physrevb.68.134417 ↗
3. Physica C · 2012 · 476 · 7710.1016/j.physc.2012.02.025 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 16130610.1103/physrevb.74.161306 ↗
5. Nat. Phys. · 2013 · 9 · 21510.1038/nphys2543 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. X · 2018 · 8 · 03105210.1103/physrevx.8.031052 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 125 · 06090110.1063/1.5050712 ↗
8. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2008 · 79 · 12370810.1063/1.3046285 ↗
9. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2010 · 73 · 12650110.1088/0034-4885/73/12/126501 ↗
10. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 22 · 06400210.1088/0953-2048/22/6/064002 ↗
11. 1986
12. 2006
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 03250610.1063/1.3614437 ↗
14. Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 104610.1021/nl100009r ↗
15. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2016 · 11 · 67710.1038/nnano.2016.63 ↗
16. Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2024 · 37 · 02501010.1088/1361-6668/ad1ae9 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 12310.1063/1.1382626 ↗
18. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2006 · 1 · 5310.1038/nnano.2006.54 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 24310110.1063/1.3046098 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 07260310.1063/1.4866277 ↗
21. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 39910.1038/nnano.2011.107 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 21451310.1103/physrevb.70.214513 ↗
23. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2014 · 77 · 05650310.1088/0034-4885/77/5/056503 ↗
24. Front. Phys. · 2020 · 8 · 43010.3389/fphy.2020.522536 ↗
25. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 63910.1038/nnano.2013.169 ↗
26. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 47400410.1088/0022-3727/43/47/474004 ↗
27. Nano-sized SQUID-on-tip for scanning probe microscopy10.1088/1742-6596/400/5/052004 ↗
28. Nanoscale · 2020 · 12 · 317410.1039/c9nr08578e ↗
29. AIP Adv. · 2022 · 12 · 02521110.1063/5.0067504 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 93 · 06050810.1103/physrevb.93.060508 ↗
31. J. Comput. Phys. · 2015 · 303 · 23810.1016/j.jcp.2015.09.049 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. B · 2022 · 106 · 13451810.1103/physrevb.106.134518 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 1381710.1103/physrevb.57.13817 ↗
34. Physica C · 2010 · 470 · 79110.1016/j.physc.2010.02.056 ↗
35. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 21450910.1103/physrevb.80.214509 ↗
36. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1978 · 40 · 104110.1103/physrevlett.40.1041 ↗
37. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 13450610.1103/physrevb.92.134506 ↗
38. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 09452710.1103/physrevb.84.094527 ↗