journal article·2024-10-01Open access

Strained Cu(111) surface can be catalytic efficient for C–C coupling in CO2 electrochemical reduction

Yangyang Xu, Yuli Han, Lixin Zhang

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 10

Abstract

It is well accepted that the Cu(100) surface is catalytic active for C–C coupling in CO2 reduction. However, the (100) surface is less active for the preceding CO* formation process and, most importantly, less stable than other surfaces. In this work, we investigate the relationship between catalytic effects and general factors such as coordination number and spacing (strain) of the Cu surface atoms. We find that the former affects the CO* formation only and the latter affects both the CO* formation and the subsequent C–C coupling. Among all the strained surfaces with larger atomic spacing, the more stable Cu(111) surface is extraordinary and outperforms Cu(100) and the high index surfaces for CO2 reduction to C2 on Cu.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Ionic liquids properties and applications · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Physics, Nankai University , Tianjin 300071,

Funding

NSF of China

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Chem. Phys. · 2023 · 158 · 20470110.1063/5.0147300 ↗
2. AIP Adv. · 2023 · 13 · 03070110.1063/5.0137706 ↗
3. AIP Adv. · 2024 · 14 · 06530510.1063/5.0203231 ↗
4. J. Chem. Phys. · 2022 · 157 · 07470410.1063/5.0100268 ↗
5. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. · 2023 · 39 · 230203710.3866/PKU.WHXB202302037 ↗
6. J. Chem. Phys. · 2024 · 160 · 09470610.1063/5.0192055 ↗
7. Surf. Sci. · 2022 · 716 · 12197610.1016/j.susc.2021.121976 ↗
8. AIP Adv. · 2019 · 9 · 06511510.1063/1.5109067 ↗
9. J. Chem. Phys. · 2021 · 155 · 11470210.1063/5.0067700 ↗
10. AIP Adv. · 2021 · 11 · 12523010.1063/5.0069568 ↗
11. J. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 147 · 09470210.1063/1.4994149 ↗
12. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2020 · 527 · 14685710.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146857 ↗
13. J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2002 · 533 · 13510.1016/s0022-0728(02)01081-1 ↗
14. Sci. Adv. · 2020 · 6 · eaay311110.1126/sciadv.aay3111 ↗
15. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2019 · 21 · 2134110.1039/c9cp03692j ↗
16. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2022 · 144 · 25910.1021/jacs.1c09508 ↗
17. Nat. Catal. · 2018 · 1 · 11110.1038/s41929-017-0009-x ↗
18. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2017 · 114 · 591810.1073/pnas.1618935114 ↗
19. ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 6 · 325210.1021/acsenergylett.1c01485 ↗
20. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2021 · 125 · 1091910.1021/acs.jpcc.1c00297 ↗
21. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2022 · 13 · 443410.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01010 ↗
22. Nat. Catal. · 2020 · 3 · 80410.1038/s41929-020-00504-x ↗
23. Nat. Commun. · 2021 · 12 · 39510.1038/s41467-020-20615-0 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/physrevb.47.558 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/physrevb.54.11169 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 ↗
27. ACS Nano · 2021 · 15 · 1827910.1021/acsnano.1c07425 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 2010.1103/physrevb.79.205423 ↗
29. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2021 · 125 · 2090510.1021/acs.jpcc.1c06375 ↗
30. Philos. Mag. Lett. · 2001 · 81 · 13710.1080/09500830010019040 ↗
31. J. Chem. Phys. · 2023 · 158 · 09470410.1063/5.0139463 ↗
32. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2019 · 495 · 14345710.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.199 ↗
33. Surf. Sci. · 1980 · 92 · 48910.1016/0039-6028(80)90219-8 ↗
34. Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 1543810.1038/ncomms15438 ↗
35. Chem · 2023 · 9 · 216110.1016/j.chempr.2023.03.022 ↗
36. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2023 · 127 · 347010.1021/acs.jpcc.2c08241 ↗
37. Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 485710.1038/s41467-022-32601-9 ↗
38. ACS Catal. · 2018 · 8 · 303510.1021/acscatal.7b03807 ↗
39. ACS Catal. · 2014 · 4 · 374210.1021/cs5012298 ↗
40. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2021 · 125 · 913810.1021/acs.jpcc.1c01586 ↗
41. ACS Nano · 2023 · 17 · 34610.1021/acsnano.2c08453 ↗
42. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2022 · 144 · 1400510.1021/jacs.2c01044 ↗
43. Surf. Sci. · 2016 · 654 · 5610.1016/j.susc.2016.08.006 ↗
44. InfoMat · 2021 · 3 · 128510.1002/inf2.12229 ↗
45. Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2021 · 50 · 1289710.1039/d1cs00535a ↗
46. ChemSusChem · 2018 · 11 · 329910.1002/cssc.201801078 ↗
47. Innovation Mater. · 2023 · 1 · 10001410.59717/j.xinn-mater.2023.100014 ↗
48. Adv. Mater. · 2022 · 34 · 211060710.1002/adma.202110607 ↗
49. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 276310.1021/acsami.8b20545 ↗
50. Chem · 2022 · 8 · 328810.1016/j.chempr.2022.08.016 ↗
51. ACS Catal. · 2023 · 13 · 471110.1021/acscatal.3c00181 ↗
52. Nat. Commun. · 2023 · 14 · 614210.1038/s41467-023-41871-w ↗
53. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 12541210.1103/physrevb.71.125412 ↗
54. ACS Catal. · 2021 · 11 · 666210.1021/acscatal.0c05671 ↗
55. Nat. Catal. · 2022 · 5 · 25110.1038/s41929-022-00757-8 ↗
56. Comput. Theor. Chem. · 2016 · 1083 · 3110.1016/j.comptc.2016.03.011 ↗
57. Surf. Sci. · 2011 · 605 · 135410.1016/j.susc.2011.04.028 ↗
58. ACS Catal. · 2018 · 8 · 149010.1021/acscatal.7b03477 ↗