Two-dimensional sound pressure distribution: Visualization and calibration-free quantification via optical wave microphone CT scanning
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, the optical wave microphone has emerged as an innovative technique, employing Fraunhofer diffraction of a laser beam, and shows promising applications in various acoustic domains where high electric and/or magnetic fields preclude the use of traditional microphones. This study utilized an optical wave microphone computed tomography (CT) scan and calibration-free quantification to ascertain sound pressure levels at multiple distances from the ultrasonic oscillator. The cornerstone of this study, which is different from the author’s previous studies, is the quantification of sound pressure distribution via a theoretical model that encompasses all physical parameters pertinent to the optical wave microphone’s experimental arrangement. This method has proven effective in visualizing and quantifying the two-dimensional sound pressure distribution emitted by an ultrasonic oscillator (40 kHz) without the necessity for calibration. The results demonstrate that the sound pressure distribution determined using the calibration-free optical wave microphone CT scan is in good agreement with the measurements obtained through a condenser microphone.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Flow Measurement and Analysis · Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging · Seismic Waves and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduated School of Science and Technology, Kumamoto University 1 , 2-39-1 Kurokami, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
Faculty of Advance Science and Technology, Kumamoto University 2 , 2-39-1 Kurokami, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 51 · 06520210.1088/1361-6463/aaa288 ↗
2. JASA Express Lett. · 2023 · 3 · 04280110.1121/10.0017790 ↗
3. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 23 · 01200310.1088/0963-0252/23/1/012003 ↗
4. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. · 2014 · 34 · 85310.1007/s11090-014-9537-1 ↗
5. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2017 · 26 · 10500110.1088/1361-6595/aa8877 ↗
6. Characteristics of sound wavegeneration in a gas discharge10.1134/1.1258752 ↗
7. OSA Continuum · 2018 · 1 · 20010.1364/OSAC.1.000200 ↗
8. 2D and 3-D visualization of acoustic waves by optical feedback interferometry
9. Sensors · 2023 · 23 · 441610.3390/s23094416 ↗
10. Sensors · 2021 · 21 · 734510.3390/s21217345 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2022 · 50 · 361610.1109/TPS.2022.3204924 ↗
12. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2021 · 49 · 358910.1109/TPS.2021.3121720 ↗
13. Przegl. Elektrotech. · 2012 · 88 · 105
14. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2016 · 44 · 307710.1109/TPS.2016.2585659 ↗
15. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 61 · 2431010.1051/epjap/2012120416 ↗
16. Acoust. Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 29 · 29510.1250/ast.29.295 ↗
17. Plasma Phys. · 1982 · 24 · 81910.1088/0032-1028/24/7/009 ↗
18. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1982 · 21 · L37210.1143/JJAP.21.L372 ↗
19. Plasma Phys. · 1983 · 25 · 61710.1088/0032-1028/25/6/003 ↗
20. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1984 · 23 · 141210.1143/JJAP.23.1412 ↗
21. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 33 · 311010.1143/JJAP.33.3110 ↗
22. Part B Appl. Int. J. Res. Surv. · 2020 · 11 · 151
23. Comput. Graph. · 1995 · 2 · 15
24. IEEE Trans. Educ. · 1969 · 12 · 2710.1109/TE.1969.4320436 ↗