Flow characteristics of ejector nozzles with different auxiliary intake valves
Source abstract
Abstract
The ejector nozzle requires a third auxiliary airflow to improve its thrust performance at transonic speed. However, different auxiliary air intake structures will affect the third auxiliary flow, which in turn may change its thrust performance and internal flow field characteristics. Herein, we simulated four nozzles with different intake valve structures (sector angles of the open-close interval structure were 30°, 22.5°, 18°, and 15°, respectively) at transonic speed (Ma = 1.2). The results show that there is significant lateral flow inside the nozzle, which induces a multi-pair vortex. In addition, the nozzle with an open-close sector angle of 30° has the largest flow rate of 9.352 kg/s, which produces the largest thrust and the slowest dissipating flow vortex, but the distortion of the flow field in nozzles is the most obvious. However, with the reduction of the sector angle of the open-close intake valves (i.e., 22.5°, 18°, and 15°), the flow rate and the thrust of the nozzle decrease. Meanwhile, the dissipation of the flow vortex is accelerated, resulting in a weakening of the flow field distortion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nanjing University of Science and Technology, School of Energy and Power Engineering , Nanjing 210016, China
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Nozzle contraction effect on the performance of the generator of periodic pulsed jets10.1134/S0015462822020069 ↗
2. Planar nozzles for controllable microthrusters10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000697 ↗
3. Ejector thrust augmentation10.2514/1.50144 ↗
4. Plasma actuator–assisted rocket nozzle for improved launcher performance10.2514/1.J057956. ↗
5. Thrust augmenting ejector analogy10.2514/3.44603 ↗
6. Concorde and the future of supersonic transport10.2514/1.9180 ↗
7. Numerical simulation of micro-nozzle flow field and thrust performance10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13550.x. ↗
8. Full Navier–Stokes analysis of a two-dimensional mixer/ejector nozzle for noise suppression
9. Interaction between primary and secondary streams of supersonic ejector systems and their performance characteristics10.2514/3.2403 ↗
10. Improved methods of characterizing ejector pumping performance10.2514/3.23342 ↗
11. How the nozzle geometry impacts vortex breakdown in compressible swirling-jet flows10.2514/1.J053843 ↗
12. Three-dimensional numerical simulation for hydrogen/air detonation: Rectangular and diagonal structures
13. Physics of vacuum generation in zero-secondary flow ejectors10.1063/1.5030073 ↗
14. Effect of stagnation temperature on the supersonic axisymmetric minimum length nozzle conception with application for air10.1134/S0869864310040049 ↗
15. How the nozzle geometry impacts vortex breakdown in compressible swirling-jet flows10.2514/1.j053843 ↗
16. Parametric experimental studies on mixing characteristics within a low area ratio rectangular supersonic gaseous ejector10.1063/1.4954669 ↗
17. Research on pneumatic adjustable nozzle
18. Performance analysis of pneumatic regulating nozzle
19. 2012