Convenient measurement of 129Xe relaxation times without the influence of intensity gradient of pump laser
Source abstract
Abstract
In the atomic cell of the spin exchange optical pumping system, the optical pumping inevitably introduces a magnetic field gradient, which affects the measurement result of the nuclear spin relaxation time a lot. To address this issue, our method achieves the measurement while excluding the influence of this magnetic field gradient. In this method, the pump laser is turned off after the spins of 87Rb and 129Xe have been effectively polarized, which results in the spin polarization of the 87Rb atoms being provided only by the spin exchange with 129Xe. Ultimately, the transverse and longitudinal components of the polarization of 129Xe are detected by the in situ87Rb atom magnetometer to obtain the T1 and T2 of 129Xe under different conditions. Using our method, since the influence of inhomogeneity caused by the pump laser is eliminated, the relaxation characteristic of atomic cells can be measured more quickly, essentially, and conveniently, which helps compare the performance of different atomic cells and find the best cell fabrication process further.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications · Quantum optics and atomic interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, National University of Defense Technology 1 , Changsha 410073, China
Hunan Key Laboratory of Mechanism and Technology of Quantum Information, National University of Defense Technology 2 , Changsha 410073, China
Nanhu Laser Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology 3 , Changsha 410073, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Distinguished Young Scholar Foundation of Hunan Province
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Kauczor · Eur. Radiol. · 1998 · 8 · 82010.1007/s003300050479 ↗
2. Kornack · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 23080110.1103/physrevlett.95.230801 ↗
3. Donley · 2010 · 17
4. Smiciklas · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 17160410.1103/physrevlett.107.171604 ↗
5. Dang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 15111010.1063/1.3491215 ↗
6. Almasi · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2020 · 125 · 20180210.1103/physrevlett.125.201802 ↗
7. Graham · Phys. Rev. D · 2018 · 97 · 05500610.1103/physrevd.97.055006 ↗
8. Karlen · 2017 · 315
9. Yim · AIP Adv. · 2022 · 12 · 01502510.1063/5.0069211 ↗
10. Lee · Appl. Opt. · 2021 · 60 · 729010.1364/ao.427613 ↗
11. Yuchen · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 52 · 35500110.1088/1361-6463/ab25a7 ↗
12. Liu · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2412210.1038/srep24122 ↗
13. Zhan · AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 04500210.1063/1.5127032 ↗
14. Wang · OSA Continuum · 2020 · 3 · 90310.1364/osac.388223 ↗
15. Ghosh · Phys. Rev. E · 2010 · 81 · 02620510.1103/physreve.81.026205 ↗
16. Qiang · J. Magn. Reson. · 2022 · 335 · 10712810.1016/j.jmr.2021.107128 ↗
17. Li · AIP Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 02501710.1063/1.4974086 ↗
18. Bell · Phys. Rev. · 1957 · 107 · 155910.1103/physrev.107.1559 ↗
19. Cohen-Tannoudji · Rev. Phys. Appl. · 1970 · 5 · 9510.1051/rphysap:019700050109500 ↗
20. Xiang · AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 09510410.1063/1.5049178 ↗
21. Hoult · J. Magn. Reson. · 2001 · 148 · 18210.1006/jmre.2000.2229 ↗
22. Carr · Phys. Rev. · 1954 · 94 · 63010.1103/physrev.94.630 ↗
23. Anger · 2008
24. Cates · Phys. Rev. A · 1988 · 37 · 287710.1103/physreva.37.2877 ↗