Self-consistent study of tearing mode with finite current gradient in the resistive-inertial and viscous-resistive regimes
Source abstract
Abstract
Via the two-field reduced magneto-hydrodynamics model, a self-consistent theory of tearing mode evolution is developed to study the stability of tearing mode in the resistive-inertial and viscous-resistive regimes. Based on the series expansion method, we obtain a closed system for tearing mode evolution with the finite current gradient (FCG) effect. Solving the closed system with correlated approximations, the dispersion relation of tearing mode with FCG in the resistive-inertial and resistive-viscous regimes is derived and discussed. Self-consistent calculations adopted in this work show that assumptions used in previous studies are not always appropriate. Furthermore, deviation from those assumptions provides a non-negligible effect to the stability of tearing mode.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Anhui Engineering Laboratory for Industrial Internet Intelligent Applications and Security, School of Computer Science and Technology, Anhui University of Technology 1 , Ma’anshan, Anhui 243002, China
CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, University of Science and Technology of China 2 , Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province · Opening Foundation CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Nave · Nucl. Fusion · 1990 · 30 · 257510.1088/0029-5515/30/12/011 ↗
2. Strauss · Phys. Plasmas · 2022 · 29 · 11250810.1063/5.0107048 ↗
3. Tenerani · Astrophys. J. · 2015 · 813 · L3210.1088/2041-8205/813/2/l32 ↗
4. Fitzpatrick · Nucl. Fusion · 1993 · 33 · 104910.1088/0029-5515/33/7/i08 ↗
5. Wang · Nucl. Fusion · 2020 · 60 · 12600810.1088/1741-4326/abaff7 ↗
6. Liu · Nucl. Fusion · 2021 · 61 · 05600910.1088/1741-4326/abe616 ↗
7. Wang · Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 24 · 03300110.1088/2058-6272/ac4692 ↗
8. Furth · Phys. Fluids · 1963 · 6 · 45910.1063/1.1706761 ↗
9. Porcelli · Phys. Fluids · 1987 · 30 · 173410.1063/1.866240 ↗
10. Mirnov · Phys. Plasmas · 2004 · 11 · 446810.1063/1.1773778 ↗
11. Fitzpatrick · Phys. Plasmas · 1994 · 1 · 330810.1063/1.870482 ↗
12. Baalrud · Phys. Plasmas · 2012 · 19 · 02210110.1063/1.3678211 ↗
13. Bertin · Phys. Rev. A · 1982 · 25 · 178610.1103/physreva.25.1786 ↗
14. Militello · Phys. Plasmas · 2004 · 11 · 12510.1063/1.1632495 ↗
15. Grasso · Phys. Plasmas · 2008 · 15 · 07211310.1063/1.2957916 ↗
16. Militello · Phys. Plasmas · 2009 · 16 · 03210110.1063/1.3079077 ↗
17. Militello · Phys. Plasmas · 2011 · 18 · 11210810.1063/1.3660410 ↗
18. Huang · Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2022 · 64 · 05502310.1088/1361-6587/ac5df2 ↗
19. Smolyakov · Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 06250610.1063/1.4811383 ↗
20. Arcis · Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2009 · 51 · 03500210.1088/0741-3335/51/3/035002 ↗
21. Fitzpatrick · Phys. Plasmas · 2022 · 29 · 09250110.1063/5.0099489 ↗
22. Hazeltine · 1992
23. Xu · Phys. Plasmas · 2015 · 22 · 10251310.1063/1.4934351 ↗
24. Li · Phys. Plasmas · 1998 · 5 · 123110.1063/1.872781 ↗
25. Arcis · Phys. Plasmas · 2006 · 13 · 05230510.1063/1.2199208 ↗
26. Luo · Phys. Plasmas · 2021 · 28 · 09250210.1063/5.0053334 ↗
27. Huang · Phys. Plasmas · 2020 · 27 · 10251410.1063/5.0024653 ↗
28. Wei · Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 12300510.1088/0029-5515/51/12/123005 ↗
29. Wei · Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 01251210.1063/1.4789381 ↗
30. Wei · Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2013 · 55 · 08500410.1088/0741-3335/55/8/085004 ↗
31. Sun · Nucl. Fusion · 2021 · 61 · 10603710.1088/1741-4326/ac1a1d ↗
32. Xie · Nucl. Fusion · 2023 · 63 · 09602510.1088/1741-4326/aceb07 ↗
33. Sun · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 117 · 11500110.1103/PhysRevLett.117.115001 ↗