Loss of energetic ions due to n = 1 internal kink instability in HL-2M
Source abstract
Abstract
Effects of three-dimensional (3D) perturbations due to an unstable n = 1 (n is the toroidal mode number) internal kink (IK) on the energetic particles (EPs) are systematically investigated for the HL-2M tokamak, utilizing the MARS-F/K code [Liu et al., Phys. Plasmas 7, 3681–3690 (2000)] and a recently developed test particle tracing module. A high-beta sawteething HL-2M scenario, simulated by the TRANSP code [Breslau et al., Transp Computer Software (2018)], is chosen for this study. In general, the 3D perturbation associated with an unstable IK is found to affect the EP drift orbit, confinement, and loss in HL-2M. The instability-induced EP loss fraction is found to be typically less than 10%, without counting for the prompt orbit loss associated with the 2D equilibrium field for counter-current particles. The latter reaches about 16% in HL-2M. For co-current EPs, a 100 G 3D magnetic field (inside the plasma) due to the IK does not induce any EP loss assuming a static perturbation. A sawtooth-like time-varying perturbation field, with the peak amplitude reaching 1000 G, can however produce about 30% loss for the co-current EPs in HL-2M. The majority of lost EPs tend to strike the lower divertor region, with a small fraction of particles striking the low-field side mid-plane region of the limiting surface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Southwestern Institute of Physics 1 , P.O. Box 432, Chengdu 610041, China
General Atomics 2 , P.O. Box 85608, San Diego, California 92186-5608, USA
Dalian University of Technology 3 , Dalian 116024, China
Funding
National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Sichuan Province Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team · Office of Science
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · S12810.1088/0029-5515/47/6/s03 ↗
2. Nucl. Fusion · 2016 · 56 · 04601410.1088/0029-5515/56/4/046014 ↗
3. Nucl. Fusion · 2018 · 58 · 07602110.1088/1741-4326/aac393 ↗
4. Nucl. Fusion · 2021 · 61 · 04600610.1088/1741-4326/abdfdd ↗
5. Nucl. Fusion · 2014 · 54 · 12500110.1088/0029-5515/54/12/125001 ↗
6. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2014 · 57 · 01403310.1088/0741-3335/57/1/014033 ↗
7. Nucl. Fusion · 2022 · 62 · 06601110.1088/1741-4326/ac5b8b ↗
8. Nucl. Fusion · 2018 · 59 · 01600410.1088/1741-4326/aaea1e ↗
9. Nucl. Fusion · 2022 · 62 · 11200210.1088/1741-4326/ac888c ↗
10. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2018 · 60 · 05500810.1088/1361-6587/aab6cc ↗
11. Nucl. Fusion · 2020 · 60 · 12603510.1088/1741-4326/abb619 ↗
12. Nucl. Fusion · 2023 · 65 · 01600410.1088/1361-6587/acb50c ↗
13. Nucl. Fusion · 2022 · 62 · 02602810.1088/1741-4326/ac3f18 ↗
14. Nucl. Fusion · 2018 · 58 · 08202910.1088/1741-4326/aac10f ↗
15. Nucl. Fusion · 2019 · 59 · 08600710.1088/1741-4326/ab1f20 ↗
16. Phys. Plasmas · 2023 · 30 · 07210410.1063/5.0149526 ↗
17. Phys. Plasmas · 2000 · 7 · 368110.1063/1.1287744 ↗
18. Phys. Plasmas · 2008 · 15 · 11250310.1063/1.3008045 ↗
19. Nucl. Fusion · 2019 · 59 · 12602110.1088/1741-4326/ab3f87 ↗
20. Phys. Plasmas · 2020 · 27 · 10250710.1063/5.0021154 ↗
21. Nucl. Fusion · 2021 · 61 · 10602910.1088/1741-4326/ac19fb ↗
22. 2018
23. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2000 · 42 · 104910.1088/0741-3335/42/10/304 ↗
24. Nucl. Fusion · 2006 · 46 · 100910.1088/0029-5515/46/12/004 ↗
25. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 07250610.1063/1.4816026 ↗
26. Phys. Plasmas · 2019 · 26 · 10210210.1063/1.5111583 ↗
27. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2021 · 63 · 04500310.1088/1361-6587/abd9e4 ↗
28. Phys. Plasmas · 2020 · 27 · 03250910.1063/1.5140968 ↗
29. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2023 · 65 · 03501310.1088/1361-6587/acb50c ↗
30. Nucl. Fusion · 2022 · 62 · 02602610.1088/1741-4326/ac3f4a ↗