journal article·2023-02-01Open access

Magnetic vortex mobility for hollow Fe3O4 submicron particles studied by a hysteresis scaling technique

Satoru Kobayashi, Tatiana Kiseleva, Deleg Sangaa, Narmandakh Jargalan, Enkhnaran Uyanga

AIP Advances· Volume 13· Issue 2

Abstract

We report results of magnetic hysteresis scaling of minor loops for hollow Fe3O4 submicron particles with variable diameter of 400–720 nm. As in the case of bulk ferromagnetic materials, a power-law scaling with an exponent of ∼1.5 was found to universally hold true between hysteresis loss and remanence of minor loops, although the magnetization process is significantly different from a bulk ferromagnet where irreversible Bloch wall displacement plays a crucial role. The minor-loop coefficient decreases with inner/outer diameter ratio and is almost independent of temperature above T = 30 K. The behavior of the coefficient indicates that a mobility of a magnetic vortex under magnetic fields increases with increasing a inner/outer diameter ratio of a hollow sphere and is weakly temperature dependent. The results suggest that the coefficient can be a sensitive indicator of the particle geometry for vortex spherical particles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Magnetic properties of thin films · Iron oxide chemistry and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Iwate University 1 , Ueda 4-3-5, Morioka 020-8551, Japan

Faculty of Physics, Moscow M.V. Lomonosov State University 2 , Moscow 119991, Russia

Institute of Physics and Technology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences 3 , Ulaanbaatar 13330, Mongolia

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Chem. Rev. · 2012 · 112 · 581810.1021/cr300068p ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Rev. · 2015 · 2 · 04130210.1063/1.4935688 ↗
3. Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 122410.1038/s41598-017-18162-8 ↗
4. Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2019 · 14 · 37610.1186/s11671-019-3169-6 ↗
5. Proc. IEEE · 1984 · 72 · 19710.1109/proc.1984.12842 ↗
6. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2008 · 320 · e53110.1016/j.jmmm.2008.04.011 ↗
7. Philos. Mag. · 2009 · 89 · 65110.1080/14786430802464230 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 02390810.1063/1.3289317 ↗
9. J. Geophys. Res. · 1975 · 80 · 404910.1029/jb080i029p04049 ↗
10. J. Geophys. Res. · 1995 · 100 · 385910.1029/94jb02878 ↗
11. J. Geophys. Res. · 2006 · 111 · B12S1310.1029/2006jb004556 ↗
12. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2020 · 512 · 16701210.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167012 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 119 · 13240110.1063/5.0060439 ↗
14. Geophys. J. Int. · 2000 · 140 · 10110.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00999.x ↗
15. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. · 1987 · 46 · 7710.1016/0031-9201(87)90173-7 ↗