journal article·2022-12-01Open access

Suppressing the filament formation by aluminum doping in anatase titanium oxide

Chih-Hung Chung, Chiung-Yuan Lin, Tsung-Fu Yang, Hsin-Hui Huang, Tuo-Hung Hou, Blanka Magyari-Köpe

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 12

Abstract

For a resistance random access memory whose insulating matrix is based on transition metal oxides, the underlying microscopic mechanism of its conductive filaments is crucial yet challenging to understand. In this paper, our first-principles calculations predict that titanium oxide prefers its anatase phase over rutile either with or without aluminum doping. We report that an oxygen vacancy in the anatase titanium oxide is stable in its neutral charge state when free of an external field, while it is unstable in the singly and doubly charged states. By calculating the dissociation energy of a single vacancy from a conductive filament, we also study the filament rupture that is modeled by an array of oxygen vacancies, with or without a nearby aluminum dopant. We find that for the dopants at a specific site, the conductive filaments tend to disconnect, which, in turn, enhances the endurance of a non-filamentary resistance random access memory.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering and Institute of Electronics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University 1 , Hsinchu 300, Taiwan

Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University 2 , Stanford, California 94305, USA

Funding

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan · Ministry of Education

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Nanosci. · 2019 · 10 · 61110.1007/s13204-019-01179-y ↗
2. J. Alloys Compd. · 2021 · 854 · 15720010.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157200 ↗
3. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2018 · 18 · 791210.1166/jnn.2018.15556 ↗
4. Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 34520110.1088/0957-4484/20/34/345201 ↗
5. ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 699810.1021/nn501824r ↗
6. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2011 · 58 · 272910.1109/ted.2011.2147791 ↗
7. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1015010.1038/srep10150 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. A · 2011 · 102 · 85710.1007/s00339-011-6296-1 ↗
9. Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 129710.1021/nl904092h ↗
10. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2018 · 65 · 97010.1109/ted.2018.2792221 ↗
11. Phys. Status Solidi A · 2020 · 217 · 190095210.1002/pssa.201900952 ↗
12. Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 1396710.1039/c6nr00824k ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 02510810.1063/1.4958672 ↗
14. Am. Mineral. · 1968 · 53 · 1929
15. Front. Chem. · 2020 · 8 · 72410.3389/fchem.2020.00724 ↗
16. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 436210.1021/jp511739h ↗
17. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2019 · 66 · 77710.1109/ted.2018.2881294 ↗
18. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2018 · 39 · 48010.1109/led.2018.2810513 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 07350210.1063/1.3685222 ↗
20. Nanotechnol. Precis. Eng. · 2020 · 3 · 21110.1016/j.npe.2020.11.002 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. · 1964 · 136 · B86410.1103/physrev.136.b864 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/physrevb.54.11169 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 150510.1103/physrevb.57.1505 ↗
24. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. · 1991 · 47 · 46210.1107/s010876819100335x ↗
25. Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 653310.1021/nl503131s ↗
26. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1953 · 36 · 14710.1111/j.1151-2916.1953.tb12855.x ↗
27. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 74 · 113110.1103/physrevlett.74.1131 ↗
28. J. Chem. Phys. · 1990 · 92 · 539710.1063/1.458517 ↗
29. 2017