Analytic modeling of neural tissue: II. Nonlinear membrane dynamics
Source abstract
Abstract
Computational modeling of neuroactivity plays a central role in our effort to understand brain dynamics in the advancements of neural engineering such as deep brain stimulation, neuroprosthetics, and magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. However, analytic solutions do not capture the fundamental nonlinear behavior of an action potential. What is needed is a method that is not constrained to only linearized models of neural tissue. Therefore, the objective of this study is to establish a robust, straightforward process for modeling neurodynamic phenomena, which preserves their nonlinear features. To address this, we turn to decomposition methods from homotopy analysis, which have emerged in recent decades as powerful tools for solving nonlinear differential equations. We solve the nonlinear ordinary differential equations of three landmark models of neural conduction—Ermentrout–Kopell, FitzHugh–Nagumo, and Hindmarsh–Rose models—using George Adomian’s decomposition method. For each variable, we construct a power series solution equivalent to a generalized Taylor series expanded about a function. The first term of the decomposition series comes from the models’ initial conditions. All subsequent terms are recursively determined from the first. We show rapid convergence, achieving a maximal error of <10−12 with only eight terms. We extend the region of convergence with one-step analytic continuation so that our complete solutions are decomposition splines. We show that this process can yield solutions for single- and multi-variable models and can characterize a single action potential or complex bursting patterns. Finally, we show that the accuracy of this decomposition approach favorably compares to an established polynomial method, B-spline collocation. The strength of this method, besides its stability and ease of computation, is that, unlike perturbation, we make no changes to the models’ equations; thus, our solutions are to the problems at hand, not simplified versions. This work validates decomposition as a viable technique for advanced neural engineering studies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: stochastic dynamics and bifurcation · Control Systems and Identification · Neural dynamics and brain function
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University 1 , 501 E Tyler Mall, Tempe, Arizona 85287-9709, USA
Department of Physical Sciences, Phoenix College 2 , 1202 W Thomas Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85013-4208, USA
School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University 3 , 699 S Mill Avenue, Tempe, Arizona 85281-3636, USA
Funding
National Institutes of Health
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Phase-contrast MRI: Physics, techniques, and clinical applications10.1148/rg.2020190039 ↗
2. MR elastography of the brain and its application in neurological diseases10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.008 ↗
3. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT)10.1137/080742932 ↗
4. Can high-field MREIT be used to directly detect neural activity? Theoretical considerations10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.005 ↗
5. Direct detection of neural activity in vitro using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT)10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.004 ↗
6. Cable theory for dendritic neurons
7. Analytic modeling of neural tissue: I. A spherical bidomain10.1186/s13408-016-0041-1 ↗
8. Parabolic bursting in an excitable system coupled with a slow oscillation10.1137/0146017 ↗
9. Subcellular oscillations and bursting10.1016/0025-5564(86)90128-8 ↗
10. Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane10.1016/s0006-3495(61)86902-6 ↗
11. An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon10.1109/jrproc.1962.288235 ↗
12. A model of neuronal bursting using three coupled first order differential equations10.1098/rspb.1984.0024 ↗
13. Comparison between Adomian’s method and He’s homotopy perturbation method10.1016/j.camwa.2008.02.023 ↗
14. 1994 · 6
15. A review of the decomposition method and some recent results for nonlinear equations10.1016/0898-1221(91)90220-x ↗
16. A bibliography of the theory and applications of the Adomian decomposition method, 1961–201110.1108/k.2012.06741gaa.007 ↗
17. Biological system interactions10.1073/pnas.81.9.2938 ↗
18. Cellular systems and aging models10.1016/0898-1221(85)90153-1 ↗
19. Solution of the Marchuk model of infections disease and immune response10.1016/0270-0255(86)90136-3 ↗
20. Solving the mathematical models of neurosciences and medicine10.1016/0378-4754(95)00021-8 ↗
21. A new approach to the solution of neurological models: Application to the Hodgkin Huxley and the FitzHugh Nagumo equations10.1007/978-3-642-58201-1 ↗
22. A convenient computational form for the Adomian polynomials10.1016/0022-247x(84)90181-1 ↗
23. A reliable modification of Adomian decomposition method10.1016/s0096-3003(98)10024-3 ↗
24. Decomposition methods: A new proof of convergence10.1016/0895-7177(93)90233-o ↗
25. 1996 · 45
26. Further remarks on convergence of decomposition method10.1016/0020-7101(94)01042-y ↗
27. Nonlinear dynamical systems: On the accuracy of Adomian’s decomposition method10.1016/0893-9659(90)90042-a ↗
28. Numerical algorithms and decomposition10.1016/0898-1221(91)90013-t ↗
29. Numerical integration, analytic continuation, and decomposition10.1016/s0096-3003(96)00052-5 ↗
30. A new modified Adomian decomposition method and its multistage form for solving nonlinear boundary value problems with Robin boundary conditions10.1016/j.apm.2013.02.002 ↗
31. 1981 · 4410.1007/978-1-4612-5856-8_2 ↗
32. 1975 · 483
33. New higher-order numerical one-step methods based on the Adomian and modified decomposition methods10.1016/j.amc.2011.08.024 ↗
34. Type I membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony10.1162/neco.1996.8.5.979 ↗
35. Synchronization in networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons with sparse, random connectivity10.1162/089976603321192059 ↗
36. Dynamics of membrane excitability determine interspike interval variability: A link between spike generation mechanisms and cortical spike train statistics10.1162/089976698300017331 ↗
37. 1987 · 319
38. 1986 · 189
39. Mathematical models of excitation and propagation in nerve
40. Meromorphic solutions in the FitzHugh–Nagumo model10.1016/j.aml.2018.02.012 ↗
41. A model of the nerve impulse using two first-order differential equations10.1038/296162a0 ↗
42. A collocation method for the numerical solution of nonlinear fractional dynamical systems10.3390/a12080156 ↗
43. 1981
44. 1975
45. 2001
46. Optimal B-spline bases for the numerical solution of fractional differential problems10.3390/axioms7030046 ↗
47. The solution of coupled Burgers’ equations using Adomian–Pade technique10.1016/j.amc.2006.11.179 ↗
48. An application of the Adomian decomposition method to the transient behavior of a model biochemical reaction10.1016/0022-247X(88)90202-8 ↗
49. Equality of partial solutions in the decomposition method for linear or nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/0898-1221(90)90246-g ↗
50. Intramembrane cavitation as a predictive bio-piezoelectric mechanism for ultrasonic brain stimulation10.1103/physrevx.4.011004 ↗
51. The Adomian decomposition method with convergence acceleration techniques for nonlinear fractional differential equations10.1016/j.camwa.2013.01.019 ↗
52. Fractional diffusion models of cardiac electrical propagation: Role of structural heterogeneity in dispersion of repolarization10.1098/rsif.2014.0352 ↗