journal article·2022-09-01Open access

Predictive modeling of operation scenarios with negative central magnetic shear and large-radius ITBs on EAST

Xuexi Zhang, Guoqiang Li, Muquan Wu, Tengfei Tang, Xiaoju Liu, Shanlu Gao, Xiaohe Wu, Xiang Gao

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 9

Abstract

Negative central magnetic shear or magnetic shear reversal is an attractive aspect for advanced operation scenarios in tokamaks as it suppresses turbulence and facilitates the formation of internal transport barriers (ITBs). The advanced operation scenario with negative magnetic shear, which is associated with high confinement quality, a large bootstrap fraction, ITBs, and so on, is one of the future goals of the experiments on EAST. In this work, modeling efforts have been made to find the operation regimes on EAST with negative central shear and large-radius ITBs. The modeling results indicate that negative central shear and large-radius ITBs can be achieved when the electron density is 〈ne〉/nG > 0.7 and the off-axis deposited electron cyclotron heating (ECH) power is 2 MW. Additionally, scenarios with lower ECH power (∼1.5 MW) have been studied since at present, the maximum ECH power that can be provided on EAST is 1.5 MW. With a lower off-axis ECH power of 1.5 MW, scenarios with negative central shear and large-radius ITBs but with a higher electron density of 〈ne〉/nG > 0.8 are obtained. The same as the first case, if the electron density is reduced to 〈ne〉/nG = 0.8 in this case, large-radius ITBs disappeared in the predicted scenario. This reveals that high electron density and large off-axis deposited ECH power are important for scenarios that have q-profiles with negative central shear and large-radius ITBs since lower hybrid current drive (LHCD) tends to peak near the axis at lower electron density, and hence, it helps to increase the temperature gradient near the axis, which will promote bootstrap in this region, leading to a centrally peaked total current density profile. Higher off-axis deposited ECH power helps to obtain scenarios with strong negative central shear and large-radius ITBs at a lower density. Scenarios predicted in this work will guide future experiments on EAST.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Superconducting Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Plasma Physics, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 , Hefei 230031, China

University of Science and Technology of China 2 , Hefei 230026, China

Advanced Energy Research Center, Shenzhen University 3 , Shenzhen 518060, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 1997 · 39 · B4710.1088/0741-3335/39/12b/005 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1994 · 72 · 121210.1103/physrevlett.72.1212 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 74 · 71810.1103/physrevlett.74.718 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 75 · 441710.1103/physrevlett.75.4417 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 75 · 442110.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4421 ↗
6. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 1996 · 38 · 164510.1088/0741-3335/38/10/001 ↗
7. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 1996 · 38 · 160310.1088/0741-3335/38/9/006 ↗
8. Nucl. Fusion · 2002 · 42 · 18010.1088/0029-5515/42/2/309 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88 · 14500410.1103/PhysRevLett.88.145004 ↗
10. Phys. Fluids · 1971 · 14 · 172510.1063/1.1693669 ↗
11. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2018 · 60 · 01404310.1088/1361-6587/aa8c9d/meta ↗
12. Phys. Plasmas · 2017 · 24 · 05611410.1063/1.4982058 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 08500110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.085001 ↗
14. Nucl. Fusion · 2005 · 45 · 57410.1088/0029-5515/45/7/004 ↗
15. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2021 · 63 · 06501310.1088/1361-6587/abf541 ↗
16. Nucl. Fusion · 2019 · 59 · 10600910.1088/1741-4326/ab2d60 ↗
17. Plasma Fusion Res. · 2013 · 8 · 240300910.1585/pfr.8.2403009 ↗
18. Nucl. Fusion · 2015 · 55 · 08300810.1088/0029-5515/55/8/083008 ↗
19. Phys. Fluids · 1987 · 30 · 374510.1063/1.866411 ↗
20. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 1989 · 17 · 610.1109/27.21664 ↗
21. Phys. Fluids B · 1991 · 3 · 41410.1063/1.859751 ↗
22. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2004 · 159 · 15710.1016/j.cpc.2003.11.002 ↗
23. Bull Am. Phys. Soc. · 1994 · 39 · 1626
24. The CQL3D Fokker-Planck Code
25. ONETWO: A computer code for modeling plasma transport in tokamaks
26. Nucl. Fusion · 2015 · 55 · 03300610.1088/0029-5515/55/3/033006 ↗
27. Phys. Plasmas · 2007 · 14 · 05590910.1063/1.2436852 ↗
28. Phys. Plasmas · 2008 · 15 · 05590810.1063/1.2889008 ↗
29. Phys. Plasmas · 2010 · 17 · 12231510.1063/1.3523058 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 13500410.1103/PhysRevLett.107.135004 ↗
31. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2012 · 54 · 12402910.1088/0741-3335/54/12/124029 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 03500210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.035006 ↗
33. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2008 · 50 · 09501010.1088/0741-3335/50/9/095010 ↗
34. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2009 · 51 · 07501810.1088/0741-3335/51/7/075018 ↗
35. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2012 · 54 · 01501510.1088/0741-3335/54/1/015015 ↗
36. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2017 · 59 · 07500510.1088/1361-6587/aa6d20 ↗
37. Nucl. Fusion · 2018 · 58 · 04600110.1088/1741-4326/aaa990 ↗
38. Phys. Plasmas · 2018 · 25 · 04250610.1063/1.5024405 ↗
39. Nucl. Fusion · 2021 · 61 · 04600210.1088/1741-4326/abd7b8 ↗
40. Nucl. Fusion · 2022 · 62 · 07601510.1088/1741-4326/ac555e ↗
41. Nucl. Fusion · 2018 · 58 · 06601110.1088/1741-4326/aabaab ↗
42. 2011 · 832
43. Phys. Plasmas · 2009 · 16 · 05611810.1063/1.3122146 ↗
44. Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 10301610.1088/0029-5515/51/10/103016 ↗
45. Phys. Plasmas · 1998 · 5 · 268710.1063/1.872956 ↗
46. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2020 · 62 · 11500710.1088/1361-6587/abb522 ↗
47. AIP Adv. · 2021 · 11 · 10500210.1063/5.0062690 ↗
48. Phys. Plasmas · 2000 · 7 · 187810.1063/1.874011 ↗