journal article·2022-03-01Open access

Domain wall depinning from FM/AFM interface defects by spin-polarized current

F. A. L. Andrade, F. V. S. Diniz, S. M. S. B. Martins, L. L. Oliveira, Ana L. Dantas, A. S. Carriço

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

We report a theoretical investigation of the impact of spin-transfer torque on magnetic head-to-head domain walls of Fe and Ni80Fe20 (Permalloy PyTM) nanowires exchange coupled to a two-sublattice uniaxial antiferromagnetic substrate. Our results indicate that provided the interface exchange interaction is large enough, the domain walls pin to interface defects consisting of steps perpendicular to the easy antiferromagnetic axis, separating terraces with opposite effective interface exchange fields. We also found that the dipolar and interface energies lead to narrow V-shaped domain walls and that the spin-transfer torque effects are restricted to the domain wall. Depinning walls from the step defect at the interface require polarized spin current densities of the order of 107 A/cm2 for both materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Magnetic Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department de Physics, State University of Rio Grande do Norte 1 , Mossoró, RN, Brazil

Department de Physics, State University of Maranhão 2 , São Luís, MA, Brazil

Department of Science and Technology, State University of Rio Grande do Norte 3 , Natal, RN, Brazil

Department de Physics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte 4 , Natal, RN, Brazil

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Norte · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Domain wall memory device
2. Proc. IEEE · 2020 · 108 · 130310.1109/jproc.2020.2975719 ↗
3. Science · 2005 · 309 · 168810.1126/science.1108813 ↗
4. Science · 2008 · 320 · 19010.1126/science.1145799 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 20720510.1103/physrevlett.97.207205 ↗
6. App. Phys. Let. · 2004 · 85 · 156210.1063/1.1787154 ↗
7. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2008 · 20 · 31300110.1088/0953-8984/20/31/313001 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 07C11610.1063/1.3067476 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1997 · 33 · 416710.1109/20.619698 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 85 · 315710.1063/1.1805697 ↗
11. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2008 · 71 · 05650110.1088/0034-4885/71/5/056501 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 12720410.1103/physrevlett.93.127204 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 02441710.1103/physrevd.70.047302 ↗
14. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 476 · 57410.1016/j.jmmm.2019.01.025 ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 128 · 15390310.1063/5.0020562 ↗
16. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2015 · 51 · 230180410.1109/tmag.2015.2459033 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 214410.1103/physrevlett.81.2144 ↗