journal article·2022-01-01Open access

Active control of Kagome lattice defect mode using point-ring defect engineering

Yanhong Yao, Qieni Lu, Mingdi Zhang, Haitao Dai

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 1

Abstract

Kagome lattice defect modes with a point-ring structure are explored theoretically in two-dimensional germanium cylinder photonic crystals using plane wave expansion and supercell methods. The number and degeneracy of the transverse magnetic field defect mode are governed by the defect setting. By varying the distance and direction of the point-ring defects, we can manipulate and control the frequency width and coupling between defect modes and the defect frequency in the bandgap. Additionally, the intensity distribution localized in the defect position is related to the parity of defect structure symmetry axes. This characteristic is highly beneficial to applications such as in resonators and narrow band filters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photonic Crystals and Applications · Photonic and Optical Devices · Fern and Epiphyte Biology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Precision Instrument and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University 1 , Tianjin 300072, China

Key Laboratory of Opto-electronics Information Technology, Ministry of Education 2 , Tianjin 300072, China

Tianjin Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Materials Physics and Preparing Technology 3 , Tianjin 300072, China

School of Science, Tianjin University 4 , Tianjin 300072, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Opt. Lett. · 2011 · 36 · 24410.1364/ol.36.000244 ↗
2. Opt. Express · 2009 · 17 · 30410.1364/oe.17.000304 ↗
3. Opt. Mater. · 2013 · 35 · 216610.1016/j.optmat.2013.05.040 ↗
4. Appl. Opt. · 2004 · 43 · 618710.1364/ao.43.006187 ↗
5. Opt. Commun. · 2020 · 461 · 12522210.1016/j.optcom.2019.125222 ↗
6. Optik · 2016 · 127 · 199310.1016/j.ijleo.2015.10.082 ↗
7. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 2000 · 12 · 63010.1109/68.849066 ↗
8. Nature · 1997 · 386 · 14310.1038/386143a0 ↗
9. AIP Adv. · 2019 · 9 · 03511210.1063/1.5079871 ↗
10. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 10501710.1063/5.0001909 ↗
11. Optik · 2015 · 126 · 191410.1016/j.ijleo.2015.05.042 ↗
12. Opt. Lett. · 2017 · 42 · 324310.1364/ol.42.003243 ↗
13. Opt. Commun. · 2019 · 450 · 2210.1016/j.optcom.2019.05.014 ↗
14. Phys. Lett. A · 2015 · 379 · 39610.1016/j.physleta.2014.11.055 ↗
15. Results Phys. · 2020 · 16 · 10287910.1016/j.rinp.2019.102879 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 04490710.1063/1.3466988 ↗
17. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 210.1088/0022-3727/42/1/015403 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 843410.1103/physrevb.48.8434 ↗
19. Chin. Phys. B · 2011 · 20 · 02420810.1088/1674-1056/20/2/024208 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. E · 2003 · 67 · 02661210.1103/PhysRevE.67.026612 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 84 · 302610.1063/1.368456 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 294910.1103/physrevlett.77.2949 ↗
23. Physica E · 2018 · 104 · 4910.1016/j.physe.2018.07.012 ↗