journal article·2020-08-01Open access

A light weight regularization for wave function parameter gradients in quantum Monte Carlo

Shivesh Pathak, Lucas K. Wagner

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 8

Abstract

The parameter derivative of the expectation value of the energy, ∂E/∂p, is a key ingredient in variational Monte Carlo (VMC) wave function optimization methods. In some cases, a naïve estimate of this derivative suffers from an infinite variance, which inhibits the efficiency of optimization methods that rely on a stable estimate of the derivative. In this work, we derive a simple regularization of the naïve estimator, which is trivial to implement in existing VMC codes, has finite variance, and a negligible bias, which can be extrapolated to zero bias with no extra cost. We use this estimator to construct an unbiased, finite variance estimation of ∂E/∂p for a multi-Slater–Jastrow trial wave function on the LiH molecule and in the optimization of a multi-Slater–Jastrow trial wave function on the CuO molecule. This regularized estimator is a simple and efficient estimator of ∂E/∂p for VMC optimization techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Machine Learning in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation · U.S. Department of Energy · National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 02451210.1103/physrevb.64.024512 ↗
2. J. Chem. Phys. · 2003 · 119 · 650010.1063/1.1604379 ↗
3. J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 126 · 08410210.1063/1.2437215 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 15020110.1103/physrevlett.94.150201 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 11020110.1103/physrevlett.98.110201 ↗
6. J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 128 · 17410110.1063/1.2908237 ↗
7. 2013
8. J. Chem. Phys. · 2015 · 143 · 16410510.1063/1.4933112 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 11450110.1103/physrevlett.100.114501 ↗
10. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2013 · 9 · 433210.1021/ct400382m ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 468210.1103/physrevlett.83.4682 ↗
12. J. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 113 · 402810.1063/1.1286598 ↗
13. J. Chem. Phys. · 2003 · 119 · 1053610.1063/1.1621615 ↗
14. J. Chem. Phys. · 1989 · 90 · 100710.1063/1.456153 ↗
15. J. Comput. Phys. · 2009 · 228 · 339010.1016/j.jcp.2009.01.017 ↗
16. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. · 2018 · 8 · e134010.1002/wcms.1340 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 16517010.1103/physrevb.94.165170 ↗
18. J. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 149 · 21411010.1063/1.5055390 ↗
19. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2017 · 13 · 159510.1021/acs.jctc.6b01028 ↗
20. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2016 · 12 · 367410.1021/acs.jctc.6b00407 ↗
21. J. Chem. Phys. · 2004 · 121 · 711010.1063/1.1794632 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. E · 2008 · 77 · 01670310.1103/physreve.77.016703 ↗