journal article·2019-03-01Open access

X-ray preheat shield in laser direct-drive ramp compression experiments

Quanxi Xue, Shaoen Jiang, Zhebin Wang, Feng Wang, Yanpeng Liu, Xueqing Zhao, Yongkun Ding

AIP Advances· Volume 9· Issue 3

Abstract

Laser drive ramp compression is an important method to achieve an extremely high-pressure but relatively low-temperature material state. In this study, we found VISAR streaks disappearing under high pressure. To solve this problem, the mechanism of probe-laser absorption in laser drive ramp compression experiments has been studied, and X-ray preheat is found to be the main factor in this mechanism. Subsequently, target configuration optimization and code simulation were performed based on previous experiments, and laser drive ramp compression experiments were performed on the SHENGGUANG prototype facility. In the experiments, the probe-laser reflectivity was above 90% at 450 GPa, which is much higher than those in previous experiments, demonstrating that the X-ray preheat was shielded well with the optimized target configuration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-pressure geophysics and materials · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics 1 , Mianyang 621900, China

State Key Laboratory of Laser Interaction with Matter, Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology 2 , Xi’an 710024, China

Funding

State Key Laboratory of Laser Interaction with Matter · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2000 · 287 · 102710.1126/science.287.5455.1027 ↗
2. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2006 · 78 · 75510.1103/revmodphys.78.755 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 07550310.1103/physrevlett.102.075503 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 12351510.1063/1.3670001 ↗
5. Nature · 2014 · 511 · 33010.1038/nature13526 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 10351210.1063/1.2196110 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 895210.1063/1.1571969 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 03490610.1063/1.2399881 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 06450110.1063/1.3079515 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. E · 2005 · 71 · 06640110.1103/PhysRevE.71.066401 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 07311010.1063/1.3646554 ↗
12. Physica B · 2016 · 495 · 6410.1016/j.physb.2016.05.004 ↗
13. AIP Advances · 2014 · 4 · 05712710.1063/1.4880039 ↗
14. Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 07270910.1063/1.4890851 ↗
15. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2011 · 82 · 10310810.1063/1.3653800 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 19550610.1103/physrevlett.93.195506 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 03550210.1103/physrevlett.91.035502 ↗
18. Phys. Plasmas · 1998 · 5 · 2401
19. Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 45 · 823910.1103/physrevb.45.8239 ↗
20. Nature · 1991 · 351 · 72110.1038/351721a0 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 1986 · 34 · 580810.1103/physrevb.34.5808 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. A · 1989 · 40 · 318310.1103/physreva.40.3183 ↗
23. Comp. Phys. Commun. · 1988 · 49 · 47510.1016/0010-4655(88)90008-2 ↗