Influence of the Hall-bar geometry on harmonic Hall voltage measurements of spin-orbit torques
Source abstract
Abstract
Harmonic Hall voltage measurements are a wide-spread quantitative technique for the measurement of spin-orbit induced effective fields in heavy-metal/ferromagnet heterostructures. In the vicinity of the voltage pickup lines in the Hall bar, the current is inhomogeneous, which leads to a hitherto not quantified reduction of the effective fields and derived quantities, such as the spin Hall angle or the spin Hall conductivity. Here we present a thorough analysis of the influence of the aspect ratio of the voltage pickup lines to current channel widths on the apparent spin Hall angle. Experiments were performed with Hall bars with a broad range of aspect ratios and a substantial reduction of the apparent spin Hall angle is already seen in Hall crosses with an aspect ratio of 1:1. Our experimental results are confirmed by finite-element simulations of the current flow.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic Properties of Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Spinelectronic Materials and Devices, Department of Physics, Bielefeld University , D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Lett. A · 1971 · 35 · 45910.1016/0375-9601(71)90196-4 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 183410.1103/physrevlett.83.1834 ↗
3. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2013 · 49 · 517210.1109/tmag.2013.2262947 ↗
4. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2015 · 87 · 121310.1103/revmodphys.87.1213 ↗
5. Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 449110.1038/srep04491 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 06041210.1103/physrevb.94.060412 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 12660110.1103/physrevlett.116.126601 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 95 · 22440910.1103/physrevb.95.224409 ↗
9. Nat. Phys. · 2015 · 11 · 49610.1038/nphys3304 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 16511710.1103/physrevb.77.165117 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 24660210.1103/physrevlett.105.246602 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 05660110.1103/physrevlett.106.056601 ↗
13. J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2012 · 24 · 21320210.1088/0953-8984/24/21/213202 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 18441510.1103/physrevb.92.184415 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 12240410.1063/1.4753947 ↗
16. Science · 2012 · 336 · 55510.1126/science.1218197 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 16250710.1063/1.3502596 ↗
18. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 58710.1038/nnano.2013.145 ↗
19. Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 24010.1038/nmat3522 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 21441910.1103/physrevb.89.214419 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 14442510.1103/physrevb.89.144425 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 22442710.1103/physrevb.90.224427 ↗
23. Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 449110.1038/srep04491 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 95 · 10440310.1103/physrevb.95.104403 ↗
25. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 56 · 0802B510.7567/jjap.56.0802b5 ↗
26. NPG Asia Mater. · 2017 · 9 · e44910.1038/am.2017.200 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 91 · 22441310.1103/physrevb.91.224413 ↗
28. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 119 · 13390210.1063/1.4945324 ↗