A comparative study of superconductivity at LaAlO3/SrTiO3 and BaTiO3/LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Lead-free BaTiO3 (BTO) film was fabricated by pulsed laser deposition on LaAlO3/SrTiO3 (LAO/STO) heterostructure in oxygen pressure of 2 × 10−3 Pa, which is experimentally required for ensuring the two-dimensional electron gas at LAO/STO heterointerface. Modulation of back-gate voltage on the superconductivity of LAO/STO and BTO/LAO/STO heterointerfaces was studied. The results indicate that the back-gate voltage can adjust the resistance at high temperatures around 300 mK, while it does not modulate the superconducting transition temperature of LAO/STO, which occurs at 160 mK. As for BTO/LAO/STO, it still shows a superconducting transition-like behavior at 110 mK. However, when a negative back-gate voltage is applied, the superconducting transition-like behavior disappears, and after removing the voltage, unlike what was observed for LAO/STO, the superconductivity cannot be recovered. Given this, some underlying mechanisms are proposed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Sichuan University 1 , Chengdu 610064, China
Laboratory of Superconducting Electronics, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology (SIMIT), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) 2 , Shanghai 200050, China
CAS Center for Excellence in Superconducting Electronics (CENSE) 3 , Shanghai 200050, China
Funding
Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Nature · 2004 · 427 · 42310.1038/nature02308 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. X · 2013 · 3 · 02101010.1103/physrevx.3.021010 ↗
3. Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 511810.1038/ncomms6118 ↗
4. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2014 · 44 · 15110.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113552 ↗
5. Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 305210.1038/s41467-019-10961-z ↗
6. Science · 2007 · 317 · 119610.1126/science.1146006 ↗
7. Nat. Commun. · 2011 · 2 · 18810.1038/ncomms1192 ↗
8. Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 803510.1038/ncomms9035 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 08541410.1103/physrevb.81.085414 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2019 · 122 · 25760110.1103/physrevlett.122.257601 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 15160110.1063/1.5119161 ↗
12. Nat. Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 20410.1038/nmat1569 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 03511210.1103/PhysRevB.74.035112 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 19680210.1103/physrevlett.98.196802 ↗
15. Nat. Mater. · 2008 · 7 · 62110.1038/nmat2223 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 04540110.1103/physrevb.85.045401 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 24530710.1103/physrevb.84.245307 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 16512710.1103/physrevb.82.165127 ↗
19. Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 335710.1002/adma.201300757 ↗
20. Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 461210.1002/adma.201301097 ↗
21. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1054810.1038/srep10548 ↗
22. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 137410.1021/acsami.7b14712 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 127 · 21490110.1063/5.0008825 ↗
24. Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 5 · 170156510.1002/admi.201701565 ↗
25. Ceram. Int. · 2014 · 40 · 1376310.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.084 ↗
26. Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 49310.1038/nmat1931 ↗
27. Prog. Theor. Phys. · 1964 · 32 · 3710.1143/PTP.32.37 ↗
28. Nature · 2008 · 456 · 62410.1038/nature07576 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 24700410.1103/physrevlett.108.247004 ↗