journal article·2023-02-01Open access

Numerical study of the trailing vehicle length on train aerodynamics under crosswind

Tianci Zhu, Wenhui Li

AIP Advances· Volume 13· Issue 2

Abstract

Limited by the wind tunnel size, a one-and-a-half train model is generally adopted during the test to represent the realistic long tandem. Thus, the reasonable arrangement of the trailing vehicle length is of significance for experimental accuracy. In this work, the aerodynamic performance of trains with different trailing vehicle lengths subjected to crosswind was studied using the improved detached eddy simulation method combined with the shear–stress–transport k–ω turbulence model. The 1/8th scaled high-speed trains with five trailing lengths were proposed, and the aerodynamic differences were evaluated at yaw angles ranging from β = 0° to β = 60°. The numerical method was validated by the previous wind tunnel test. Results show that the aerodynamics and flow patterns of the La = 0.50 and the benchmark are highly relevant. The downstream dummy vehicle length has the greatest effect on aerodynamic coefficients at a higher yaw angle (β > 30°), especially at β = 60°, whereas the effects become insignificant at a lower yaw angle (β < 30°). For various La lengths, notable discrepancy appears at the leeward and top side where large vortexes shed off from the roof. The larger contributions to the lateral force and lift force coefficients are mainly due to these areas. A suitable length of La = 0.50 is therefore recommended to obtain more accurate aerodynamics of a long train set.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University , Changsha 410075, China

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. ANSYS, Inc. · 2016
2. The effect of tail geometry on the slipstream and unsteady wake structure of high-speed trains10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.01.014 ↗
3. Full-scale model testing on a ballastless high-speed railway under simulated train moving loads10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.08.003 ↗
4. 2010
5. Crosswind action on rail vehicles: Wind tunnel experimental analyses10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.030 ↗
6. BS EN · 2018
7. Wind tunnel tests on train scale models to investigate the effect of infrastructure scenario10.1016/j.jweia.2010.01.001 ↗
8. Aerodynamic behaviour investigation of the new EMUV250 train to crosswind10.1016/j.jweia.2009.10.015 ↗
9. Detached-eddy simulation of flow around high-speed train on a bridge under cross winds10.1007/s11771-016-3335-2 ↗
10. Comparative analysis of the effect of different nose lengths on train aerodynamic performance under crosswind10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.12.016 ↗
11. Crosswind effects on the stability of a model passenger train—A comparison of static and moving experiments10.1016/j.jweia.2014.11.009 ↗
12. On the effect of crosswinds on the slipstream of a freight train and associated effects10.1016/j.jweia.2016.07.001 ↗
13. Trains in crosswinds–comparison of full-scale on-train measurements, physical model tests and CFD calculations10.1016/j.jweia.2018.03.002 ↗
14. Large-eddy simulation of the flow around a freight wagon subjected to a crosswind10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.06.026 ↗
15. Impact of the trailing edge shape of a downstream dummy vehicle on train aerodynamics subjected to crosswind10.1177/0954409720915039 ↗
16. Effect of crosswinds on aerodynamic characteristics around a generic train model10.1080/23248378.2018.1424573 ↗
17. Large eddy simulation of the flow around a simplified train moving through a crosswind flow10.1016/j.jweia.2012.07.001 ↗
18. Effect of landform on aerodynamic performance of high-speed trains in cutting under cross wind10.1007/s11771-013-1554-3 ↗
19. On the effect of rail-end slope in train aerodynamics under crosswind10.1080/00423114.2021.1883067 ↗
20. Influence of ribs on train aerodynamic performances10.1007/s11771-015-2719-z ↗
21. Comparison of RANS and detached eddy simulation results to wind-tunnel data for the surface pressures upon a class 43 high-speed train10.1115/1.4029261 ↗
22. Experimental study on the effect of Reynolds number on aerodynamic performance of high-speed train with and without yaw angle10.1016/j.jweia.2016.08.007 ↗
23. Comparison between steady and moving railway vehicles subjected to crosswind by CFD analysis10.1016/j.jweia.2016.07.006 ↗
24. Wind tunnel experiments on reducing separated flow region around front ends of vehicles on meter-gauge railway lines10.2219/rtriqr.50.20 ↗
25. Wind tunnel investigation of an ICE 3 endcar on three standard ground scenarios
26. Numerical comparisons of the aerodynamic performances of wind-tunnel train models with different inter-carriage gap spacings under crosswind10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104680 ↗
27. Crosswind stability of high-speed trains in special cuts10.1007/s11771-015-2817-y ↗
28. Numerical simulation of flow around a high-speed train subjected to different windbreak walls and yaw angles10.29252/jafm.12.04.29484 ↗
29. Experimental study on the effect of wind angles on pressure distribution of train streamlined zone and train aerodynamic forces10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.024 ↗