journal article·2022-05-01Open access

Suppression of non-axisymmetric field-induced α-particle loss channels in a quasi-axisymmetric stellarator

Yichao Zhang, Haifeng Liu, Jie Huang, Yuhong Xu, Jian Zhang, Akihiro Shimizu, Shinsuke Satake, Mitsutaka Isobe, Xianqu Wang, Jun Cheng, Hai Liu, Xin Zhang, Changjian Tang

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 5

Abstract

In future fusion reactors, the confinement of α-particles is a crucial issue. The perfect omnigenity may be difficult to achieve in the quasi-isodynamic and quasi-symmetric stellarators when a multi-objective optimization is considered. Non-axisymmetric field can result in collisionless particles’ transport via localized trapping by ripples. Specific loss channels have been revealed to essentially exist in quasi-axisymmetric stellarators [Yang et al., Europhys. Lett. 129, 35001 (2020)] and W7-X [J. M. Faustin et al., Nucl. Fusion 56, 092006 (2016)]. It indicates a drastic loss of collisionless ions through these channels. This paper is devoted to investigate the effects of axisymmetry-breaking magnetic fields on collisionless α-particle transport in the CFQS (Chinese First Quasi-axisymmetric Stellarator) -like reactor configuration. A semi-analytic representation of radial and poloidal drifts in Boozer coordinates is given, by which we found an effective route to mitigate α-particle losses, i.e., adjusting the location of the quasi-axisymmetric radial position. Such a route enables the enhancement of the poloidal drift and decrease of radial drift in peripheral regions of the identified loss channels. The particles launched inside the quasi-axisymmetric radial surface can be well confined because localized particles that may fall in loss channels can transit into blocked particles near the quasi-axisymmetric surface, escaping from loss channels, which is beneficial for the improvement of the particle confinement. Moreover, this paper may provide a set of proxy functions for suppression of energetic particle losses to optimize stellarator configurations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Fusion Science, School of Physical Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University 1 , Chengdu 610031, China

National Institute for Fusion Science, National Institutes of Natural Sciences 2 , Toki 509-5292, Japan

The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI 3 , Toki 509-5292, Japan

College of Physics, Sichuan University 4 , Chengdu 610065, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · Advanced Foreign Expert Introduction Program · Central Government Funds of Guiding Local Scientific and Technological Development for Sichuan Province

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Fusion Energy · 2015 · 34 · 77410.1007/s10894-015-9862-2 ↗
2. Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · S26410.1088/0029-5515/47/6/s05 ↗
3. Nucl. Fusion · 1994 · 34 · 53510.1088/0029-5515/34/4/i07 ↗
4. Nucl. Fusion · 2021 · 61 · 03602110.1088/1741-4326/abd3ec ↗
5. J. Plasma Phys. · 2019 · 85 · 90585050810.1017/s0022377819000680 ↗
6. Matter Radiat. Extremes · 2016 · 1 · 19210.1016/j.mre.2016.07.001 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2022 · 128 · 03500110.1103/physrevlett.128.035001 ↗
8. Phys. Plasmas · 1996 · 3 · 248310.1063/1.871965 ↗
9. Phys. Lett. A · 1988 · 129 · 11310.1016/0375-9601(88)90080-1 ↗
10. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 1992 · 34 · 103710.1088/0741-3335/34/6/010 ↗
11. Phys. Fluids · 1981 · 24 · 199910.1063/1.863297 ↗
12. Phys. Plasmas · 1999 · 6 · 350910.1063/1.873611 ↗
13. J. Plasma Fusion Res. SERIES · 2004 · 6 · 622
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 67410.1103/physrevlett.78.674 ↗
15. Nucl. Fusion · 2021 · 61 · 01601410.1088/1741-4326/abbc85 ↗
16. Europhys. Lett. · 2020 · 129 · 3500110.1209/0295-5075/129/35001 ↗
17. J. Plasma Phys. · 1981 · 26 · 28310.1017/s0022377800010680 ↗
18. Phys. Fluids B · 1989 · 1 · 98010.1063/1.858986 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1981 · 47 · 64710.1103/physrevlett.47.647 ↗
20. Phys. Plasmas · 2001 · 8 · 273110.1063/1.1365958 ↗
21. Nucl. Fusion · 2020 · 60 · 05600910.1088/1741-4326/ab7936 ↗
22. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 01500410.1063/1.5124452 ↗
23. Plasma Fusion Res. · 2019 · 14 · 340315110.1585/pfr.14.3403151 ↗
24. Plasma Fusion Res. · 2019 · 14 · 340509710.1585/pfr.14.3405097 ↗
25. Plasma Fusion Res. · 2018 · 13 · 340312310.1585/pfr.13.3403123 ↗
26. Plasma Fusion Res. · 2018 · 13 · 340506710.1585/pfr.13.3405067 ↗
27. Plasma Fusion Res. · 2019 · 14 · 340207410.1585/pfr.14.3402074 ↗
28. Phys. Fluids · 1983 · 26 · 355310.1063/1.864116 ↗
29. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2014 · 77 · 08700110.1088/0034-4885/77/8/087001 ↗
30. Nucl. Fusion · 1992 · 32 · 61110.1088/0029-5515/32/4/i07 ↗
31. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2020 · 62 · 01402310.1088/1361-6587/ab5add ↗
32. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2021 · 63 · 12503310.1088/1361-6587/ac35ee ↗
33. Nucl. Fusion · 2001 · 41 · 21510.1088/0029-5515/41/2/308 ↗
34. Phys. Fluids B · 1991 · 3 · 282210.1063/1.859916 ↗
35. J. Plasma Phys. · 2018 · 84 · 90584020510.1017/s0022377818000259 ↗
36. Nucl. Fusion · 2019 · 59 · 02601410.1088/1741-4326/aaf604 ↗
37. Nucl. Fusion · 2021 · 61 · 11606010.1088/1741-4326/ac2991 ↗
38. Nucl. Fusion · 2016 · 56 · 09200610.1088/0029-5515/56/9/092006 ↗