journal article·2020-12-01Open access

A mechanical relation model for biaxial tension of nanofibrous membrane

Yunlei Yin, Hongchen Liu, Jinli Zhou, Hongying Yang

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 12

Abstract

It is important to evaluate the mechanical biocompatibility of nanofibrous membranes used in tissue engineering. This investigation proposed a modeling analysis to predict the biaxial behavior of randomly oriented nanofibrous membranes. An electrospinning process prepared poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibers. The uniaxial stress–strain curve of a single nanofiber and the biaxial stress–strain curves of the membranes were experimentally obtained. The applicability of the analytical model was verified by the comparison between modeling prediction and experimental data. Experimental stress was lower than the predicted stress until large plastic deformation occurred because of structural imperfections, prestress, and the stretch-induced orientation in the membranes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Textile, Zhongyuan University of Technology 1 , Zhengzhou 450007, China

State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, South China University of Technology 2 , Guangzhou 510640, China

Henan Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Textile and Garment Industry 3 , Zhengzhou 450007, China

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2020 · 113 · 11091310.1016/j.msec.2020.110913 ↗
2. Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2017 · 76 · 141310.1016/j.msec.2017.03.034 ↗
3. Carbohydr. Polym. · 2016 · 148 · 10710.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.094 ↗
4. Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2020 · 112 · 11093910.1016/j.msec.2020.110939 ↗
5. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B · 2020 · 108 · 131110.1002/jbm.b.34479 ↗
6. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. · 2019 · 37 · 56010.1007/s10118-019-2231-2 ↗
7. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. · 2020 · 14 · 165210.1002/term.3130 ↗
8. Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2020 · 109 · 11052110.1016/j.msec.2019.110521 ↗
9. Compos. Commun. · 2019 · 11 · 1210.1016/j.coco.2018.10.010 ↗
10. Acta Biomater. · 2012 · 8 · 21810.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.015 ↗
11. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. · 2017 · 12 · 1710.1177/155892501701200303 ↗
12. Nanomater · 2018 · 8 · 2910.3390/nano8010029 ↗
13. Int. J. Solids Struct. · 2018 · 136-137 · 27110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.12.020 ↗
14. Int. J. Exp. Comput. Biomech. · 2009 · 1 · 4510.1504/ijecb.2009.022858 ↗
15. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 54 · 02530210.1088/1361-6463/abba95 ↗
16. J. Nano Res. · 2013 · 23 · 9610.4028/www.scientific.net/jnanor.23.96 ↗
17. Iran. Polym. J. · 2014 · 23 · 94710.1007/s13726-014-0290-3 ↗
18. Membranes · 2017 · 7 · 6710.3390/membranes7040067 ↗
19. J. Mater. Chem. B · 2018 · 6 · 393410.1039/c8tb00535d ↗
20. Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2019 · 229 · 31010.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.03.020 ↗
21. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2020 · 510 · 14546210.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145462 ↗
22. Nanomater · 2018 · 8 · 34810.3390/nano8050348 ↗
23. Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 770910.1038/s41598-020-64735-5 ↗