journal article·2018-05-01Open access

Size and temperature dependence of M-H loop for Pt/CoFe/IrMn heterojunction

Zhen Zhao, Dan Wei

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 5

Abstract

M-H loops of current-driven spin-orbit torque (SOT) devices with NM/FM/AFM structure have been simulated at different temperature from 50-400 K by Hybrid Monte-Carlo micromagnetics in nanodots and large-sized films. The model includes the polycrystalline microstructure. The effects of anisotropy defects size on M-H loops of dots are discussed, which coincide with experimental scaling tendency, where a lower Kmin at the defect center strongly influences the switching coercivity. Both the defect size and the temperature increase reduces the perpendicular coercivity Hc of nanodots. If the equivalent current-induced switching field is set as 100 mT, the critical switchable diameter of nanodots is around 50 nm with defect damage region of Kmin<0.65K, whereas in nearly perfectly deposited films (Kmin→K or insensitive to dot areas change), the critical switchable diameter will increase to around 100 nm [A. Kurenkov, Appl. Phys. Lett., 110, 9, (2017)].
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Theoretical and Computational Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials (MOE), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University , Beijing 100084, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 09660210.1103/physrevlett.109.096602 ↗
2. Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 24010.1038/nmat3522 ↗
3. Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1085410.1038/ncomms10854 ↗
4. Nat. Mater. · 2016 · 15 · 53510.1038/nmat4566 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Letters · 2015 · 107 · 01240110.1063/1.4926371 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 110 · 09241010.1063/1.4977838 ↗
7. Nat. Nano. · 2016 · 11 · 75810.1038/nnano.2016.84 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 07240910.1063/1.4913422 ↗
9. J. Magn. Magn. Mater · 2004 · 279 · 31710.1016/j.jmmm.2004.01.089 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2017 · 7 · 02402310.1103/physrevapplied.7.024023 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Magn · 2016 · 52 · 710080810.1109/tmag.2016.2590381 ↗
12. Chinese Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 34 · 02750110.1088/0256-307x/34/2/027501 ↗
13. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2017 · 53 · 710050410.1109/tmag.2017.2719019 ↗
14. 2017
15. Nat. Phys. · 2016 · 13 · 16210.1038/nphys3883 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 05390110.1063/1.4863139 ↗
17. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2011 · 47 · 272010.1109/tmag.2011.2148169 ↗
18. EPL (Europhysics Letters) · 2012 · 100 · 5700210.1209/0295-5075/100/57002 ↗
19. Acta Materialia · 2002 · 50 · 37910.1016/s1359-6454(01)00337-8 ↗
20. Zeitschrift für Physik · 1936 · 100 · 19710.1007/bf01418601 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 07390510.1063/1.3489985 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 13391410.1063/1.4870451 ↗
23. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films · 2009 · 27 · 106210.1116/1.3116586 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 02441410.1103/physrevb.78.024414 ↗