Thickness-induced spin-reorientation originated from competing magnetic shape anisotropies
Source abstract
Abstract
Engineering the surface morphology of magnetic film is one of the important methods to tune the magnetic anisotropy of ultrathin magnetic material. However, the influence of competing shape effects on magnetic anisotropy of ultrathin film is still not clearly demonstrated. Here, we investigated the magnetic anisotropy of obliquely deposited Fe films on vicinal Si(111) substrate by using in-situ and ex-situ surface magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE). Thickness-induced in-plane spin-reorientation transition, i.e. magnetization easy axis gradually rotates away from the step direction, was observed. MOKE measurements and micromagnetic simulation demonstrate this spin-reorientation transition process largely originated from the competition between step-induced magnetic shape anisotropy and oblique-deposition-induced magnetic shape anisotropy. Our study indicates the possibility of tuning magnetic spin order orientation by the competing magnetic shape anisotropies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 State Key Laboratory of Magnetism and Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, , Beijing 100190, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 School of Physical Sciences, , Beijing 100190, China
Funding
The National Basic Research Program of China · The National Natural Sciences Foundation of China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2008 · 71 · 05650110.1088/0034-4885/71/5/056501 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 02442410.1103/PhysRevB.87.024424 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 08543610.1103/PhysRevB.86.085436 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 06443210.1103/PhysRevB.86.064432 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 01442010.1103/PhysRevB.85.014420 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 24240410.1063/1.4883886 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 18720110.1103/PhysRevLett.116.187201 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 14251110.1063/1.3396077 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 68 · 83910.1103/PhysRevLett.68.839 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 21720210.1103/PhysRevLett.101.217202 ↗
11. Sci Rep · 2015 · 5 · 1105510.1038/srep11055 ↗
12. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2014 · 351 · 10410.1016/j.jmmm.2013.09.058 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 04250410.1063/1.3075847 ↗
14. Europhys. Lett. · 2006 · 75 · 11910.1209/epl/i2006-10089-5 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 121610.1103/PhysRevB.60.1216 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 1187110.1103/PhysRevB.59.11871 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 49 · 1508410.1103/PhysRevB.49.15084 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · R1271310.1103/PhysRevB.57.R12713 ↗
19. Surf. Sci. · 2009 · 603 · 37310.1016/j.susc.2008.11.026 ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 10J11010.1063/1.1851926 ↗
21. Sci Rep · 2013 · 3 · 154710.1038/srep01547 ↗
22. New J. Phys. · 2007 · 9 · 2910.1088/1367-2630/9/2/029 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 91 · 10440310.1103/PhysRevB.91.104403 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 1970 · 41 · 161710.1063/1.1659081 ↗
25. M. Donahue and D. Porter, The Object Oriented MicroMagnetic Framework (OOMMF) Project at ITL/NIST, The OOMMF code is available at http://math.nist.gov/oommf.
26. J. Geophys. Res. · 1993 · 98 · 955110.1029/93JB00694 ↗
27. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 83 · 343210.1063/1.367113 ↗
28. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2010 · 49 · 8410.1016/j.commatsci.2010.04.024 ↗
29. AIP Advances · 2013 · 3 · 06210110.1063/1.4809664 ↗