On the nature of a supposed water model
Source abstract
Abstract
A cell model that has been proposed by Stanley and Franzese in 2002 for modeling water is based on Potts variables that represent the possible orientations of bonds between water molecules. We show that in the liquid phase, where all cells are occupied by a molecule, the Hamiltonian of the cell model can be rewritten as a Hamiltonian of a conventional Potts model, albeit with two types of coupling constants. We argue that such a model, while having a first-order phase transition, cannot display the critical end point that is postulated for the phase transition between a high- and low-density liquid. A closer look at the mean-field calculations that claim to find such an end point in the cell model reveals that the mean-field theory is constructed such that the symmetry constraints on the order parameter are violated. This is equivalent to introducing an external field. The introduction of such a field can be given a physical justification due to the fact that water does not have the type of long-range order occurring in the Potts model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Darmstadt Institut für Festkörperphysik, , Hochschulstr. 6, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 2009
2. J. Chem. Phys. · 1999 · 111 · 898010.1063/1.480241 ↗
3. Europhys. Lett. · 2012 · 97 · 5600510.1209/0295-5075/97/56005 ↗
4. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 113 · 400810.1021/jp805227c ↗
5. J. Chem. Phys. · 1971 · 54 · 368210.1063/1.1675414 ↗
6. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2002 · 106 · 1182910.1021/jp021418h ↗
7. J. Chem. Phys. · 2002 · 117 · 510110.1063/1.1505438 ↗
8. Biophys. Chem. · 2003 · 105 · 44910.1016/S0301-4622(03)00107-8 ↗
9. J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 128 · 024505110.1063/1.2938859 ↗
10. J. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 137 · 06450310.1063/1.4742332 ↗
11. Nature · 1992 · 360 · 32410.1038/360324a0 ↗
12. Science · 2008 · 319 · 58210.1126/science.1131939 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. E · 1996 · 53 · 614410.1103/PhysRevE.53.6144 ↗
14. J. Phys. Chem. · 1982 · 86 · 98210.1021/j100395a030 ↗
15. J. Phys. Chem. · 1982 · 86 · 300210.1021/j100212a038 ↗
16. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · 220110.1088/0953-8984/14/9/309 ↗
17. Physica A · 2002 · 314 · 50810.1016/S0378-4371(02)01186-X ↗
18. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 20512610.1088/0953-8984/19/20/205126 ↗
19. Computer Physics Communications · 2009 · 180 · 49710.1016/j.cpc.2009.01.018 ↗
20. PNAS · 2010 · 107 · 130110.1073/pnas.0912756107 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. E · 2012 · 85 · 01060210.1103/PhysRevE.85.010602 ↗
22. J. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 137 · 20450210.1063/1.4767355 ↗
23. J. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 138 · 23450310.1063/1.4810875 ↗
24. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1982 · 54 · 23510.1103/RevModPhys.54.235 ↗
25. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 1954 · 9 · 68110.1143/JPSJ.9.681 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 24 · 137410.1103/PhysRevB.24.1374 ↗
27. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2000 · 519 · 28110.1063/1.1291569 ↗
28. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 13 · 1975910.1039/c1cp22316j ↗
29. J. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 137 · 21450510.1063/1.4769126 ↗
30. J. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 138 · 03450510.1063/1.4775738 ↗
31. J. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 135 · 13450310.1063/1.3643333 ↗
32. J. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 138 · 21450410.1063/1.4807479 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 288110.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2881 ↗
34. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 33410.1103/PhysRevLett.85.334 ↗
35. PNAS · 2011 · 108 · 1220610.1073/pnas.1100238108 ↗
36. Phys. Rev. A · 1971 · 4 · 107110.1103/PhysRevA.4.1071 ↗