Role of wire diameter size in the high voltage pulse wire explosion: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
We performed molecular dynamics simulations of the high voltage pulse explosion of single aluminum wires with the energy ratio of 0.6 in vacuum and studied the role of wire radial dimension. Simulation results show that large-diameter wires having a large material depth and a small specific surface can maintain a higher deposition energy density and effectively reduce the influence of the radial difference in thermodynamic parameters, leading to higher explosion velocity and a lower vaporization rate in the large-diameter wire. The most significant effect is that the larger diameter wire has a longer explosion development time. In addition, the propagation and reflection of the rarefaction waves in the wire result in two explosion regimes: the spinodal decomposition propagating inward from the surface and the cavitation boiling from the center to the surface. Increasing the diameter will increase the domination range of the spinodal decomposition mechanism.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Vacuum Technology and Physics, Lanzhou Institute of Physics 1 , Lanzhou 730000, China
College of Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Harbin Engineering University 2 , Harbin 150001, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Nanopart. Res. · 2003 · 5 · 53910.1023/b:nano.0000006069.45073.0b ↗
2. Nanotechnol. Russ. · 2009 · 4 · 41510.1134/s1995078009070039 ↗
3. Scr. Mater. · 2001 · 44 · 224710.1016/s1359-6462(01)00757-6 ↗
4. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2017 · 173894910.1155/2017/1738949 ↗
5. J. Aerosol Sci. · 1998 · 29 · 51110.1016/s0021-8502(97)10032-5 ↗
6. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2019 · 162 · 8810.1016/j.commatsci.2019.02.026 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 18410210.1103/physrevb.67.184102 ↗
8. Phys. Plasmas · 2005 · 12 · 05270210.1063/1.1883180 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 25550410.1103/physrevlett.89.255504 ↗
10. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2019 · 170 · 10914210.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109142 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 96 · 167410.1063/1.1767976 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. E · 2005 · 71 · 04640410.1103/physreve.71.046404 ↗
13. Phys. Plasmas · 2018 · 25 · 10270910.1063/1.5049904 ↗
14. Sol. Energy · 2018 · 165 · 16710.1016/j.solener.2018.03.028 ↗
15. Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 14571010.1088/0957-4484/19/14/145710 ↗
16. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., Pis’ma Red. · 1993 · 57 · 99
17. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 76 · 42810.1134/1.1528695 ↗
18. Sov. Phys. Usp. · 1984 · 27 · 74910.1070/pu1984v027n10abeh004128 ↗
19. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2004 · 16 · S262910.1088/0953-8984/16/27/003 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 1984 · 29 · 644310.1103/physrevb.29.6443 ↗
21. J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
22. AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 07530710.1063/1.5037662 ↗
23. Israelachvili · 2011 · 169
24. Israelachvili · 2011 · 381
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 07500210.1103/physrevlett.91.075002 ↗
26. 1992
27. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2012 · 1426 · 120710.1063/1.3686497 ↗
28. AIP Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 09500210.1063/1.4998298 ↗
29. Phys. Solid State · 2012 · 54 · 110910.1134/s1063783412060376 ↗
30. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1965 · 36 · 132710.1063/1.1719889 ↗
31. Tech. Phys. · 2010 · 55 · 50910.1134/s1063784210040122 ↗
32. Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 02570310.1088/0957-4484/19/02/025703 ↗