journal article·2021-06-01Open access

Role of wire diameter size in the high voltage pulse wire explosion: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations

Yanxu Pu, Fangwei Lv, Xinfeng Sun, Tianping Zhang, Hui Qi, Hai Geng, Chenchen Wu, Xinwei Cheng

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 6

Abstract

We performed molecular dynamics simulations of the high voltage pulse explosion of single aluminum wires with the energy ratio of 0.6 in vacuum and studied the role of wire radial dimension. Simulation results show that large-diameter wires having a large material depth and a small specific surface can maintain a higher deposition energy density and effectively reduce the influence of the radial difference in thermodynamic parameters, leading to higher explosion velocity and a lower vaporization rate in the large-diameter wire. The most significant effect is that the larger diameter wire has a longer explosion development time. In addition, the propagation and reflection of the rarefaction waves in the wire result in two explosion regimes: the spinodal decomposition propagating inward from the surface and the cavitation boiling from the center to the surface. Increasing the diameter will increase the domination range of the spinodal decomposition mechanism.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Vacuum Technology and Physics, Lanzhou Institute of Physics 1 , Lanzhou 730000, China

College of Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Harbin Engineering University 2 , Harbin 150001, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Nanopart. Res. · 2003 · 5 · 53910.1023/b:nano.0000006069.45073.0b ↗
2. Nanotechnol. Russ. · 2009 · 4 · 41510.1134/s1995078009070039 ↗
3. Scr. Mater. · 2001 · 44 · 224710.1016/s1359-6462(01)00757-6 ↗
4. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2017 · 173894910.1155/2017/1738949 ↗
5. J. Aerosol Sci. · 1998 · 29 · 51110.1016/s0021-8502(97)10032-5 ↗
6. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2019 · 162 · 8810.1016/j.commatsci.2019.02.026 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 18410210.1103/physrevb.67.184102 ↗
8. Phys. Plasmas · 2005 · 12 · 05270210.1063/1.1883180 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 25550410.1103/physrevlett.89.255504 ↗
10. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2019 · 170 · 10914210.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109142 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 96 · 167410.1063/1.1767976 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. E · 2005 · 71 · 04640410.1103/physreve.71.046404 ↗
13. Phys. Plasmas · 2018 · 25 · 10270910.1063/1.5049904 ↗
14. Sol. Energy · 2018 · 165 · 16710.1016/j.solener.2018.03.028 ↗
15. Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 14571010.1088/0957-4484/19/14/145710 ↗
16. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., Pis’ma Red. · 1993 · 57 · 99
17. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 76 · 42810.1134/1.1528695 ↗
18. Sov. Phys. Usp. · 1984 · 27 · 74910.1070/pu1984v027n10abeh004128 ↗
19. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2004 · 16 · S262910.1088/0953-8984/16/27/003 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 1984 · 29 · 644310.1103/physrevb.29.6443 ↗
21. J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
22. AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 07530710.1063/1.5037662 ↗
23. Israelachvili · 2011 · 169
24. Israelachvili · 2011 · 381
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 07500210.1103/physrevlett.91.075002 ↗
26. 1992
27. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2012 · 1426 · 120710.1063/1.3686497 ↗
28. AIP Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 09500210.1063/1.4998298 ↗
29. Phys. Solid State · 2012 · 54 · 110910.1134/s1063783412060376 ↗
30. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1965 · 36 · 132710.1063/1.1719889 ↗
31. Tech. Phys. · 2010 · 55 · 50910.1134/s1063784210040122 ↗
32. Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 02570310.1088/0957-4484/19/02/025703 ↗