Research on the test method of substituting bulk current injection for electromagnetic radiation in the coupling channel of parallel double lines
Source abstract
Abstract
Radiation effect test cannot be performed in large-scale space simulations of a strong field electromagnetic environment, and existing BCI (bulk current injection) technology employed for nonlinear system tests is subjected to its limitation. Given this, the present study analyzes the equivalent radiation test method of BCI in the parallel double-line coupling channel. To be specific, the response analysis models of the EUT (equipment under test) under the radiation condition and the injection condition are developed with the nonlinear response system as the EUT. In addition, the corresponding equivalent relationship is derived between the voltage of the injection excitation source and the radiation field intensity. Subsequently, the condition and the test method to substitute BCI for radiation are proposed and experimentally verified. As revealed from the research results, specific to nonlinear response systems, the BCI method proposed here can be accurately equated with the radiation effect test of the EUT. It is noteworthy that the maximum test error only reaches 3.62 dB, capable of satisfying the actual requirements of the project.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression · Internet of Things and Social Network Interactions · Power Line Communications and Noise
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Key Laboratory on Electromagnetic Environment Effects, Army Engineering University , Shijiazhuang Campus, Shijiazhuang 050003, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 1, 2010
2. 2016
3. 2020
4. Chin. J. Radio Sci. · 2017 · 32 · 15110.13443/j.cjors.2017021801 ↗
5. 2019
6. High Voltage Eng. · 2016 · 42 · 134710.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20160412012 ↗
7. Electron. Qual. · 2018 · 7
8. 2018
9. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. · 2018 · 60 · 86610.1109/temc.2017.2751580 ↗
10. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. · 2018 · 34 · 55910.3233/jifs-17777 ↗
11. IEEE Lett. Electromagn. Compat. Pract. Appl. · 2020 · 2 · 2810.1109/LEMCPA.2020.2979227 ↗
12. Enforcing correlation between conducted and radiated susceptibility test setups for aerospace involving shielded cables
13. High Power Laser Part. Beams · 2018 · 30 · 093201
14. J. Hebei Norm. Univ. · 2018 · 42 · 396
15. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. · 2018 · 60 · 127010.1109/TEMC.2018.2810074 ↗
16. IEEE Lett. Electromagn. Compat · 1996 · 38 · 46910.1109/15.536077 ↗
17. High Voltage Eng. · 2012 · 11 · 2828
18. J. Microwaves · 2018 · 34 · 7210.14183/j.cnki.1005-6122.201806016 ↗
19. High Voltage Eng. · 2015 · 41 · 421310.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.2015.12.047 ↗
20. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 99 · 105759.110.1016/j.ast.2020.105759 ↗
21. Acta Astronaut. · 2019 · 162 · 1410.1016/j.actaastro.2019.05.016 ↗
22. Adv. Space Res. · 2016 · 57 · 231410.1016/j.asr.2016.03.022 ↗
23. Fire Control Radar Technol. · 2020 · 191 · 97
24. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. · 2013 · 55 · 129310.1109/temc.2013.2255295 ↗
25. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. · 2013 · 55 · 134610.1109/temc.2013.2261302 ↗
26. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. · 1996 · 44 · 142910.1109/22.536026 ↗
27. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. · 2013 · 55 · 19510.1109/temc.2012.2208117 ↗
28. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. · 2007 · 49 · 56310.1109/temc.2007.902385 ↗
29. 2009