Method for reducing waveform distortion by increasing damping strength for electromagnetic vibrators
Source abstract
Abstract
Voice coil motors are frequently used as force drivers in electromagnetic vibrators. As a constant current is applied, the generated driving force is not constant but varies with displacement due to the inhomogeneous magnetic field within the stroke range. When a sinusoidal current is applied to the voice coil motors, the above effect can lead to a severe waveform distortion on the output acceleration. In order to find an effective method to reduce it, a general nonlinear dynamic model has been established and analyzed with a focus on the effect of the damping strength of the vibrator on the waveform distortion. The numerical calculations show that the waveform distortion can be efficiently reduced by increasing the damping strength under various working conditions. Based on these results, an eddy current damper (ECD) was designed with a maximized damping coefficient and applied to our home-made vibrator. Once the ECD is incorporated, the waveform distortion of the output acceleration is significantly reduced, which validates our modeling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics · Electric Motor Design and Analysis · Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
MOE Key Laboratory of Fundamental Physical Quantities Measurement and Hubei Key Laboratory of Gravitation and Quantum Physics, PGMF and School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan 430074, People’s Republic of China
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Sound Vib. · 2011 · 45 · 152110.1007/978-1-4419-9834-7_136 ↗
2. 1999
3. 2003
4. 2009
5. Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 25 · 08590110.1088/0957-0233/25/8/085901 ↗
6. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics · 2017 · 22 · 78510.1109/TMECH.2016.2635260 ↗
7. 2003 · 70
8. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2013 · 49 · 486510.1109/tmag.2012.2225109 ↗
9. Appl. Mech. Mater. · 2014 · 511-512 · 40210.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.511-512.402 ↗
10. Appl. Mech. Mater. · 2013 · 274 · 57510.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.274.575 ↗
11. Numerical solution of fuzzy differential equation by Runge–Kutta method
12. IMA J. Appl. Math. · 1978 · 21 · 4710.1093/imamat/21.1.47 ↗
13. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 07500110.1088/0022-3727/42/7/075001 ↗
14. Microsyst. Technol. · 2010 · 16 · 1910.1007/s00542-008-0731-z ↗
15. J. Sound Vib. · 2005 · 288 · 117710.1016/j.jsv.2005.01.016 ↗
16. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2007 · 43 · 2610.1109/tmag.2006.885859 ↗
17. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 07500110.1088/0022-3727/46/7/075001 ↗