Thermal stability of resistive switching effect in ZnO/BiFeO3 bilayer structure
Source abstract
Abstract
Superior thermal stability of resistive switching performance is essential for resistive random access memory (R-RAM) device with high reliability. Thermal stable resistive switching performance can be achieved in ZnO/BiFeO3 bilayer structure by modifying the interface. The bilayer structure with a distinct interface is fabricated with an optimized annealing process in chemical solution deposition method. This bilayer structure shows a better thermal stability compared to the case with an indistinct interface. Attempt has been made to explain such effects based on conductive filament mechanism. We propose that the confinement of the oxygen vacancies migration at distinct interface could be the reason for the thermal stability. Our results indicate that morphology of interface is an important factor to improve the thermal stability of R-RAM.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, School of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University 1 , Guangzhou 510275, China
Micro&Nano Physics and Mechanics Research Laboratory, School of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University 2 , Guangzhou 510275, China
Sino-French Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University 3 , Zhuhai 519082, China
Funding
Guangzhou Science and Technology Projects · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. P. IEEE. · 2012 · 100 · 195110.1109/jproc.2012.2190369 ↗
2. Mater. Today. · 2008 · 11 · 2810.1016/s1369-7021(08)70119-6 ↗
3. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2012 · 75 · 07650210.1088/0034-4885/75/7/076502 ↗
4. Mater. Sci. Eng., R. · 2014 · 83 · 110.1016/j.mser.2014.06.002 ↗
5. Cryst. Growth. Des. · 2018 · 18 · 186410.1021/acs.cgd.7b01745 ↗
6. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 31 · 06300210.1088/0268-1242/31/6/063002 ↗
7. IEEE. Electron. Device. Letters. · 2010 · 31 · 47610.1109/led.2010.2041893 ↗
8. IEEE. Trans. Electron. Devices. · 2011 · 58 · 312410.1109/ted.2011.2160265 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 17210510.1063/1.3491803 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 22350610.1063/1.4922252 ↗
11. Microelectron. Eng. · 2017 · 172 · 2610.1016/j.mee.2017.02.019 ↗
12. J. Mater. Chem. C. · 2015 · 3 · 571510.1039/c5tc00842e ↗
13. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices. · 2016 · 63 · 36010.1109/ted.2015.2503145 ↗
14. Solid. State. Commun. · 2009 · 149 · 161110.1016/j.ssc.2009.06.033 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 15350510.1063/1.4946006 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 17350310.1063/1.4803462 ↗
17. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 17510110.1088/1361-6463/aa64bc ↗
18. Nature. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 62510.1038/nmat3070 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 06290110.1063/1.4864396 ↗
20. Semicond. Sci. Tech. · 2017 · 32 · 09300610.1088/1361-6641/aa78cd ↗
21. Appl. Phys. A-Mater. · 2016 · 122 · 33710.1007/s00339-016-9872-6 ↗
22. Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 394110.1002/adma.201201506 ↗
23. Adv. Funt. Mater. · 2014 · 24 · 217110.1002/adfm.201303274 ↗
24. Nature. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 83310.1038/nmat2023 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. · 1956 · 103 · 164810.1103/physrev.103.1648 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 1991 · 70 · 38210.1063/1.350286 ↗
27. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 2 · 131910.1039/a908800h ↗
28. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2008 · 254 · 244110.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.063 ↗
29. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 29540410.1088/0022-3727/43/29/295404 ↗