Interfacial thermal conductance of buckling carbon nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
Bond transition of sp2 to sp3 in carbon nanotube can be realized through bending operation at buckling location, which affects the electronic, mechanical and thermal properties of buckled carbon nanotube. In this work, thermal properties of buckled tri-walled carbon nanotube with sp3 bonds are explored using molecular dynamics. Our results reveal that interfacial thermal conductance at buckling location is sensitive to the bending angle, which decreases exponentially with increasing bending angle until 90 degree because of increasing the number of interlayer sp3 bonds. When the bending angle is beyond 90 degree, there are sp3 bonds formed on the outer-tube walls which provide new paths for heat transfer. The insight of mechanism of thermal properties is analyzed by determining atomic micro-heat flux scattering. Our findings provide a flexible and applicable method to design thermal management device. This unusual phenomenon is explained by the micro-heat flux migration and stress distributions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Thermal properties of materials · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University 1 , 712100 Yangling, China
Department of Mathematics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2 , 27514 North Carolina, United States
Centre for Innovative Structures and Materials, School of Engineering, RMIT 3 , VIC3001 Melbourne, Australia
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 15760110.1103/physrevlett.90.157601 ↗
2. Nature · 2000 · 405 · 76710.1038/35015515 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 15640110.1103/physrevlett.90.156401 ↗
4. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2001 · 123 · 383810.1021/ja010172b ↗
5. Chem. Commun. · 2009 · 13 · 1667
6. Carbon · 2010 · 48 · 292510.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.029 ↗
7. Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 361510.1002/adma.200800830 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 1065310.1103/physrevb.62.r10653 ↗
9. Science · 2001 · 293 · 7610.1126/science.1061797 ↗
10. Phys. Today · 1999 · 52 · 2210.1063/1.882658 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 24550210.1103/physrevlett.93.245502 ↗
12. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA · 2004 · 101 · 1369910.1073/pnas.0405877101 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 2610810.1063/1.3466956 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 1065310.1103/PhysRevB.62.R10653 ↗
15. Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 14310.1021/nl062424i ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 26010.1063/1.1383279 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 5311510.1063/1.4740259 ↗
18. Cheminform · 2002 · 62 · 1869
19. Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 81910.1021/nl404182k ↗
20. Carbon · 2017 · 117 · 39910.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.011 ↗
21. J. Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 106 · 608210.1063/1.473271 ↗
22. J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
23. J. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 112 · 647210.1063/1.481208 ↗
24. Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 488710.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.017 ↗
25. Journal of the Mechanics & Physics of Solids · 2013 · 61 · 142110.1016/j.jmps.2013.01.008 ↗
26. Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 10570510.1088/0957-4484/22/10/105705 ↗
27. 1997
28. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 19310410.1063/1.4902074 ↗
29. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 26190810.1063/1.4732100 ↗
30. Journal of Physics D Applied Physics · 2017 · 50 · 47530210.1088/1361-6463/aa8ff8 ↗
31. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 22430810.1063/1.4842896 ↗
32. Nature Communications · 2016 · 7 · 1285410.1038/ncomms12854 ↗