Effects of the pulse-driven magnetic field detuning on the calibration of coil constants while using noble gases
Source abstract
Abstract
In the calibration of coil constants using the Free Induction Decay (FID) signal of noble gases, we analyse the effects of the pulse-driven magnetic field detuning on the calibration results. This method is based on the inverse relation between the π/2 pulse duration and its amplitude. We confirmed that obtaining a precise frequency is a prerequisite for ensuring the accuracy of research using the initial amplitude of the FID signal. In this paper, the spin dynamics of noble gases and its time-domain solution under the driving pulse have been discussed with regard to different detuning ranges. Experimental results are in good agreement with our theoretical predictions, which indicate the correctness of our theoretical deduction. Therefore, the frequency of the pulse-driven magnetic field is an important factor to the calibration of coil constants, it should be determined with a high degree of accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications · NMR spectroscopy and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Instrument Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Beihang University , Beijing 100191, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2010 · 46 · 363510.1109/tmag.2010.2048576 ↗
2. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2011 · 50 · 05660210.7567/jjap.50.056602 ↗
3. Nature · 2003 · 422 · 59610.1038/nature01484 ↗
4. Gyroscopy and Navigation · 2014 · 5 · 7510.1134/s2075108714020060 ↗
5. IEEE Sensors Journal · 2011 · 11 · 174910.1109/jsen.2011.2157679 ↗
6. Measurement Science & Technology · 2017
7. Optics and Lasers in Engineering · 2005 · 43 · 38710.1016/j.optlaseng.2004.03.010 ↗
8. Physical Review Letters · 2010 · 105 · 19360110.1103/physrevlett.105.193601 ↗
9. Phys. Lett. B · 2010 · 686 · 11410.1016/j.physletb.2010.02.014 ↗
10. J. Microelectromech. Syst. · 2006 · 15 · 109810.1109/jmems.2006.880212 ↗
11. Sens. and Actuators, A: Phys. · 2009 · 151 · 14510.1016/j.sna.2009.02.029 ↗
12. Space Sci. Rev. · 2008 · 141 · 23510.1007/s11214-008-9365-9 ↗
13. Eur. Phys. J. D · 2016 · 7070 · 203
14. AIP Advances · 2017 · 7 · 2227
15. Optik · 2017 · 138 · 34110.1016/j.ijleo.2017.03.043 ↗
16. Scientific Reports · 2016 · 6 · 2412210.1038/srep24122 ↗
17. Journal of Chemical Physics · 1975 · 62 · 438010.1063/1.430338 ↗
18. AIP Advances · 2017 · 7 · 02501710.1063/1.4974086 ↗
19. AIP Advances · 2017 · 7 · 08522110.1063/1.4998732 ↗
20. Physical Review A · 1990 · 41 · 367210.1103/physreva.41.3672 ↗
21. 2010 · 82
22. S. J. Seltzer, Ph. D. thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, 2008.
23. Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. · 2016 · 65 · 37310.1016/bs.aamop.2016.04.002 ↗
24. E. J. Eklund, Ph. D. thesis, University of California, California, 2008.