journal article·2015-09-01Open access

Comparing the magnetic resonant coupling radiofrequency stimulation to the traditional approaches: Ex-vivo tissue voltage measurement and electromagnetic simulation analysis

Sai Ho Yeung, Raunaq Pradhan, Xiaohua Feng, Yuanjin Zheng

AIP Advances· Volume 5· Issue 9

Abstract

Recently, the design concept of magnetic resonant coupling has been adapted to electromagnetic therapy applications such as non-invasive radiofrequency (RF) stimulation. This technique can significantly increase the electric field radiated from the magnetic coil at the stimulation target, and hence enhancing the current flowing through the nerve, thus enabling stimulation. In this paper, the developed magnetic resonant coupling (MRC) stimulation, magnetic stimulation (MS) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) are compared. The differences between the MRC RF stimulation and other techniques are presented in terms of the operating mechanism, ex-vivo tissue voltage measurement and electromagnetic simulation analysis. The ev-vivo tissue voltage measurement experiment is performed on the compared devices based on measuring the voltage induced by electromagnetic induction at the tissue. The focusing effect, E field and voltage induced across the tissue, and the attenuation due to the increase of separation between the coil and the target are analyzed. The electromagnetic stimulation will also be performed to obtain the electric field and magnetic field distribution around the biological medium. The electric field intensity is proportional to the induced current and the magnetic field is corresponding to the electromagnetic induction across the biological medium. The comparison between the MRC RF stimulator and the MS and TENS devices revealed that the MRC RF stimulator has several advantages over the others for the applications of inducing current in the biological medium for stimulation purposes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wireless Power Transfer Systems · Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nanyang Technological University School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, , Singapore 639798

Funding

National Medical Research Council

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2007 · 317 · 8310.1126/science.1143254 ↗
2. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2000 · 47 · 149310.1109/10.880101 ↗
3. Physics in Medicine and Biology · 2010 · 55 · 254110.1088/0031-9155/55/9/008 ↗
4. Physics in Medicine and Biology · 2012 · 57 · 775310.1088/0031-9155/57/23/7753 ↗
5. Physics in Medicine and Biology · 2009 · 54 · 363110.1088/0031-9155/54/12/002 ↗
6. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2000 · 47 · 60010.1109/10.841332 ↗
7. Journal of Applied Physics · 2009 · 105 · 07B322 - 07B322-3
8. Journal of Applied Physics · 2002 · 91 · 873010.1063/1.1454987 ↗
9. Physics in Medicine and Biology · 2009 · 54 · 311310.1088/0031-9155/54/10/010 ↗
10. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine · 1983 · 2 · 1410.1109/MEMB.1983.5005985 ↗
11. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 1976 · 23 · 34110.1109/TBME.1976.324595 ↗
12. J. Neurosurg. · 1973 · 39 · 71810.3171/jns.1973.39.6.0718 ↗
13. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine · 2011 · 30 · 2110.3109/15368378.2011.566775 ↗
14. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine · 2007 · 26 · 25710.1080/15368370701580806 ↗
15. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2011 · 47 · 306010.1109/TMAG.2011.2153183 ↗
16. 1989
17. 2002
18. 1998
19. IEEE Transactions on Education · 1980 · 23 · 15610.1109/TE.1980.4321401 ↗
20. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies · 2010 · 11 · 37610.1016/j.ifset.2010.01.011 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 06370210.1063/1.4791791 ↗