Sparse signal recovery based on adaptive algorithms for debris detector
Source abstract
Abstract
Inductive debris sensors are generally used in online debris detection and perform well in monitoring the wear condition of rotating facilities. The detection accuracy is restricted by the superposition and noise of the impedance signal. From the perspective of machine learning, superposition is underfitting and noise is overfitting, and both are caused by inappropriate model complexity. Therefore, a series of machine learning approaches is proposed in this paper to devise a sparse signal processing model that can adapt to model complexity. We propose that the algorithm applied to debris detection can recover the impulse signals from the impedance signals and help determine the material and the size of the debris. Numerical simulations are carried out to prove that the superposition resolution is 0.6 half-wave width and has the ability to resist noise with a signal-to-noise ratio of more than 10 dB. With the test results, we demonstrate how the proposed method can solve superposition and resist noise.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Electrical Fault Detection and Protection · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology at Weihai 1 , Weihai 264209, China
Marine Engineering Department, Dalian Maritime University 2 , Dalian 116026, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China-Yunnan Joint Fund · National Key Research and Development Program of China · Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation · Shandong Province Key Research and Development Plan
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Magnetization model and detection mechanism of a microparticle in a harmonic magnetic field10.1109/tmech.2019.2928704 ↗
2. A direct reflection OLVF debris detector based on dark-field imaging10.1088/1361-6501/aab9fc ↗
3. Assessment of antiwear properties of lube oils using online visual ferrograph method10.1080/10402004.2014.880537 ↗
4. Measurement system based on electrostatic sensors to detect moving charged debris with planar-isotropic accuracy10.1109/tim.2018.2853938 ↗
5. Mathematical modelling, simulation and experimental verification of a scara robot10.1016/j.simpat.2004.11.004 ↗
6. Theoretical characterization of a gas path debris detection monitoring system based on electrostatic sensors and charge amplifiers10.1016/j.measurement.2014.12.003 ↗
7. A novel sensing technique for measurement of magnitude and polarity of electrostatic charge distribution across individual particles10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.10.002 ↗
8. Magnetic-capacitive wear debris sensor plug for condition monitoring of hydraulic systems10.1109/jsen.2018.2869675 ↗
9. Capacitance sensor design for reducing errors in phase concentration measurements10.1016/s0955-5986(98)00006-5 ↗
10. Research on capacitive sensor for online oil monitoring
11. Ultrasonic echo waveshape features extraction based on QPSO-matching pursuit for online wear debris discrimination10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.01.002 ↗
12. Sparse deconvolution of ultrasonic NDE traces—A preliminary study
13. Ultrasonic echo spike detection using l1-regularized sparse deconvolution
14. A general framework for aliasing corrections of inductive oil debris detection based on artificial neural networks10.1109/jsen.2020.2994458 ↗
15. Deconvolution with the l1 norm10.1190/1.1440921 ↗
16. Exact support recovery for sparse spikes deconvolution10.1007/s10208-014-9228-6 ↗
17. Exact reconstruction using Beurling minimal extrapolation10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.05.011 ↗
18. Multidimensional sparse super-resolution10.1137/17m1147822 ↗
19. Image reconstruction for structured-illumination microscopy with low signal level10.1364/oe.22.008687 ↗
20. Sparse deconvolution using support vector machines10.1155/2008/816507 ↗
21. A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays10.1109/tsp.2005.850882 ↗
22. Adaptive superresolution in deconvolution of sparse peaks10.1109/tsp.2020.3037373 ↗
23. V. Duval and P. Gabriel, “Sparse spikes deconvolution on thin grids,” arXiv:1503.08577 (2015).
24. Super-resolution of point sources via convex programming10.1093/imaiai/iaw005 ↗
25. Sparse recovery beyond compressed sensing: Separable nonlinear inverse problems10.1109/tit.2020.2985015 ↗
26. A Bregman adaptive sparse-spike deconvolution method in the frequency domain10.1007/s11770-019-0779-9 ↗
27. Frequency-domain sparse Bayesian learning inversion of ava data for elastic parameters reflectivities10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.07.016 ↗
28. Reconstruction of a sparse spike train from a portion of its spectrum and application to high-resolution deconvolution10.1190/1.1441261 ↗