Repeatable and reproducible formation/rupture of oxygen vacancy filaments in the vicinity of a polycrystalline HfO2 surface
Source abstract
Abstract
We theoretically investigated the dynamics of oxygen vacancies (Vo’s) and the effect of changing their charge states by performing first-principles molecular dynamics simulations at a temperature of 1000 K. Calculations were performed for two structures of HfO2: a slab with (110) surfaces and a bulk single crystal. Our studies revealed that when the charge state of the Vo’s changed from neutral (VO0) to divalent (VO2+), Vo’s repelled each other and dispersed, in both the slab and bulk structures. In contrast, when the charge state of the Vo’s changed from VO2+ to VO0, the Vo’s attracted each other and resumed their original positions only in the slab structure. Therefore, the repeatable and reproducible formation/rupture of a VO filament can occur near the crystal surface, where the symmetry of the bulk crystal is broken. This result is consistent with the experimental results demonstrating that the resistive switching of the resistive random access memory develops in polycrystalline metal oxides rather than in single crystalline metal oxides.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Semiconductor materials and devices · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Science, Tokyo University of Science 1 , Nijuku 6-3-1, Katsushika, Tokyo 125-8585, Japan
Graduate School of Sustainability Science, Tottori University 2 , Koyama-Minami 4-101, Tottori 680-8552, Japan
National Institute for Materials Science 3 , Namiki 1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan
Funding
Nippon Sheet Glass Foundation for Materials Science and Engineering
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 192610.1063/1.126214 ↗
2. Surface Science Reports · 2013 · 68 · 6810.1016/j.surfrep.2013.01.002 ↗
3. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 2201310.1021/am506351u ↗
4. Microelectronic Engineering · 2006 · 83 · 186710.1016/j.mee.2006.01.271 ↗
5. Applied Physics Letters · 2010 · 97 · 24350910.1063/1.3527086 ↗
6. Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 357310.1002/adma.201000186 ↗
7. Nature · 2008 · 453 · 8010.1038/nature06932 ↗
8. Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 21520110.1088/0957-4484/20/21/215201 ↗
9. AIP Advances · 2016 · 6 · 08520910.1063/1.4961229 ↗
10. Physical Review B · 2007 · 75 · 10411210.1103/physrevb.75.104112 ↗
11. Physical Review B · 2013 · 87 · 15520110.1103/physrevb.87.155201 ↗
12. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 2013 · 60 · 340010.1109/ted.2013.2279397 ↗
13. Applied Physics Letters · 2007 · 91 · 20211510.1063/1.2815658 ↗
14. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2017 · 56 · 04CE1210.7567/jjap.56.04ce12 ↗
15. Solid-State Electronics · 2011 · 65-66 · 14610.1016/j.sse.2011.06.031 ↗
16. Journal of Applied Physics · 2017 · 120 · 21530210.1063/1.4969045 ↗
17. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2006 · 45 · L99110.1143/jjap.45.l991 ↗
18. Applied Physics Letters · 2008 · 93 · 04210610.1063/1.2966141 ↗
19. MRS Advances · 2017 · 7 · 1
20. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2012 · 59 · 204910.1109/ted.2012.2199497 ↗
21. Applied Physics Letters · 2011 · 99 · 06350710.1063/1.3624472 ↗
22. 2011 · 12.1.1
23. Microelectron. Eng. · 2013 · 112 · 15710.1016/j.mee.2013.04.005 ↗
24. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2013 · 60 · 39110.1109/ted.2012.2223821 ↗
25. 2014 · 012091
26. Applied Physics Express · 2009 · 2 · 06140110.1143/apex.2.061401 ↗
27. Journal of the Electrochemical Society · 2011 · 158 · H12810.1149/1.3517173 ↗
28. 2007
29. Journal of the American Ceramic Society · 1970 · 53 · 3
30. 2007 · 767