journal article·2018-05-01Open access

Benchmarking the communication fidelity of biomolecular signaling cascades featuring pseudo-one-dimensional transport

Pratip Rana, Kevin R. Pilkiewicz, Michael L. Mayo, Preetam Ghosh

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 5

Abstract

Synthetic biologists endeavor to predict how the increasing complexity of multi-step signaling cascades impacts the fidelity of molecular signaling, whereby information about the cellular state is often transmitted with proteins that diffuse by a pseudo-one-dimensional stochastic process. This begs the question of how the cell leverages passive transport mechanisms to distinguish informative signals from the intrinsic noise of diffusion. We address this problem by using a one-dimensional drift-diffusion model to derive an approximate lower bound on the degree of facilitation needed to achieve single-bit informational efficiency in signaling cascades as a function of their length. Within the assumptions of our model, we find that a universal curve of the Shannon-Hartley form describes the information transmitted by a signaling chain of arbitrary length and depends upon only a small number of physically measurable parameters. This enables our model to be used in conjunction with experimental measurements to aid in the selective design of biomolecular systems that can overcome noise to function reliably, even at the single-cell level.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks · Gene Regulatory Network Analysis · Diffusion and Search Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University 1 , Richmond, VA 23284, USA

Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center 2 , Vicksburg, MS 39180, USA

Funding

U.S. Army

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Nature Reviews Genetics · 2016 · 17 · 14610.1038/nrg.2015.34 ↗
2. Science · 2008 · 319 · 153910.1126/science.1151153 ↗
3. Bioinformatics · 2006 · 22 · 279010.1093/bioinformatics/btl469 ↗
4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2017 · 114 · 575510.1073/pnas.1615660114 ↗
5. Physical Review E · 2016 · 94 · 03241210.1103/physreve.94.032412 ↗
6. Science · 2011 · 334 · 35410.1126/science.1204553 ↗
7. The nervous system in the context of information theory10.1007/978-3-642-73831-9_7 ↗
8. International Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2009 · 10 · 172910.3390/ijms10041729 ↗
9. Journal of Bacteriology · 1993 · 175 · 248310.1128/jb.175.9.2483-2489.1993 ↗
10. Current Opinion in Cell Biology · 2008 · 20 · 4110.1016/j.ceb.2007.11.006 ↗
11. Science · 2012 · 336 · 159510.1126/science.1221648 ↗
12. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · 2004 · 5 · 102410.1038/nrm1524 ↗
13. Physical Review E · 2002 · 66 · 01191610.1103/physreve.66.011916 ↗
14. Physical Review Letters · 2006 · 97 · 04830210.1103/PhysRevLett.97.048302 ↗
15. 2013
16. IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience · 2012 · 11 · 8910.1109/tnb.2012.2190546 ↗
17. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2010 · 28 · 60210.1109/jsac.2010.100509 ↗
18. IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience · 2012 · 11 · 13510.1109/tnb.2012.2191570 ↗
19. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2012 · 58 · 467810.1109/tit.2012.2193554 ↗
20. 2012 · 2973
21. 2007 · 160
22. 2012 · 299
23. 2011
24. Cell · 2005 · 123 · 102510.1016/j.cell.2005.09.031 ↗
25. 2012
26. Inverse Gaussian distribution
27. Proceedings of the IRE · 1949 · 37 · 1010.1109/jrproc.1949.232969 ↗
28. Journal of Bacteriology · 2010 · 192 · 453510.1128/jb.00284-10 ↗
29. Current Opinion in Neurobiology · 2001 · 11 · 34910.1016/s0959-4388(00)00218-x ↗
30. Nature Communications · 2014 · 5 · 589110.1038/ncomms6891 ↗
31. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2007 · 104 · 1609810.1073/pnas.0706599104 ↗
32. Physical Review Letters · 2008 · 100 · 16810510.1103/PhysRevLett.100.168105 ↗