journal article·2017-05-01Open access

Exchange bias effect in CaMn𝟏−𝒙Re𝒙O3

V. Markovich, I. Fita, A. Wisniewski, R. Puzniak, C. Martin, G. Jung, G. Gorodetsky

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 5

Abstract

Exchange bias effect in CaMn1-xRexO3 (x ≤ 0.1) has been investigated. The effect is very small in the samples doped at x = 0.02 and 0.04, but increases monotonously with further increase in Re doping. For x = 0.1, both vertical and horizontal shifts in hysteresis loop of field cooled sample decrease monotonously with increasing temperature and vanish above 70 K, while coercivity disappears only above 90 K upon approaching the Néel temperature. Exchange bias field, coercivity, and remanence asymmetry depend sensitively on temperature and maximal measuring field. Magnetic training effect has been studied for x = 0.06, 0.08, 0.1 samples and analyzed using a spin relaxation model. The observed exchange bias is attributed to the low-temperature phase separation into ferromagnetic clusters and the G-type and/or C-type antiferromagnetic matrix.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Magnetic properties of thin films · Multiferroics and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev 1 Department of Physics, , 84105 Beer-Sheva, Israel

Polish Academy of Sciences 2 Institute of Physics, , PL-02668 Warsaw, Poland

ISMRA 3 Laboratoire CRISMAT, UMR 6508, , 14050 Caen Cedex, France

Funding

Polish NCN

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. · 1956 · 102 · 141310.1103/PhysRev.102.1413 ↗
2. Meiklejohn · Phys. Rev. · 1957 · 105 · 90410.1103/PhysRev.105.904 ↗
3. J. Appl. Phys. · 1962 · 33 · 132810.1063/1.1728716 ↗
4. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 192 · 20310.1016/S0304-8853(98)00266-2 ↗
5. Phys. Rep. · 2005 · 422 · 6510.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.004 ↗
6. Zabel · 2008 · 9710.1007/978-3-540-73462-8 ↗
7. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. · 2011 · 23 · 07320110.1088/0953-8984/23/7/073201 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 17442210.1103/PhysRevB.72.174422 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 01250310.1063/1.2426887 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 06442410.1103/PhysRevB.88.064424 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 14440910.1103/PhysRevB.77.144409 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. · 1967 · 164 · 77910.1103/PhysRev.164.779 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. · 1955 · 100 · 54510.1103/PhysRev.100.545 ↗
14. Mater. Res. Bull. · 2000 · 35 · 157910.1016/S0025-5408(00)00373-1 ↗
15. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 910210.1021/ja0714282 ↗
16. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2008 · 320 · 60010.1016/j.jmmm.2007.05.026 ↗
17. Geshev · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2009 · 21 · 07800110.1088/0953-8984/21/7/078001 ↗
18. Geshev · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 06610810.1063/1.3098262 ↗
19. J. Magn. Magn. Mater · 2016 · 402 · 7610.1016/j.jmmm.2015.11.046 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 17720810.1103/PhysRevLett.102.177208 ↗