journal article·2015-07-01Open access

Electronic and magnetic properties of N-N split substitution in GaAs: A hybrid density functional study

Ruiqi Huang, Sanjun Wang, Qingxia Wang, Xiaolin Cai, Chong Li, Yu Jia, Fei Wang

AIP Advances· Volume 5· Issue 7

Abstract

Employing the first-principles combined with hybrid functional calculations, the electronic and magnetic properties of GaAs doped with a N2 molecule are investigated in this work. We find that in Ga32As31(N2)As the N-N split is able to saturate the dangling bond of Ga atom ,form sp3-like hybridization, and simultaneously supply an extra localized electron, leading to a magnetic ground state with a magnetic moment of ∼1μB. This magnetic ground state is different from previously nonmagnetic results predicted by PBE functional, which results from the self-interaction error inherent in semi-local density functional theory. Moreover, the band gap of magnetic ground state of Ga32As31(N2)As alloy decreases, which is relative to GaAs . Finally we discuss and explain why the magnetism is not discovered in previous experiments and theories.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Zhengzhou University 1 International Joint Research Laboratory for Quantum Functional Materials of Henan, and School of Physics and Engineering, , Zhengzhou, 450001, China

Henan Institution of Education 2 Department of Physics, , Zhengzhou, 450046, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Scholarship Council

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 15520110.1103/PhysRevB.71.155201 ↗
2. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 02310310.1063/1.4886178 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1756810.1103/PhysRevB.54.17568 ↗
4. Opt. Exp. · 2014 · 22 · 3063310.1364/OE.22.030633 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 11520310.1103/PhysRevB.65.115203 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · R1124510.1103/PhysRevB.60.R11245 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 19320410.1103/PhysRevB.82.193204 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 08513410.1103/PhysRevB.85.085134 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 03520410.1103/PhysRevB.88.035204 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 19530710.1103/PhysRevB.71.195307 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 231410.1063/1.1465522 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1990 · 56 · 145110.1063/1.102495 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 10371010.1063/1.2798629 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 20010.1063/1.1383280 ↗
15. J. Cryst. Growth · 2013 · 362 · 19710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.03.059 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 04522210.1103/PhysRevB.72.045222 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 16521210.1103/PhysRevB.71.165212 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 25211510.1063/1.2150252 ↗
19. JETP Lett. · 2005 · 82 · 45510.1134/1.2142877 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 161201(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.82.161201 ↗
21. New J. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 04302210.1088/1367-2630/14/4/043022 ↗
22. J. Chem. Phys. C · 2012 · 116 · 1819310.1021/jp303279r ↗
23. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2008 · 80 · 310.1103/RevModPhys.80.3 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 14640110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.146401 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 17443510.1103/PhysRevB.87.174435 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 20541210.1103/PhysRevB.81.205412 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 11680110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.116801 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
29. J. Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 123 · 17410110.1063/1.2085170 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 86 · 178910.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1789 ↗
33. Opt. Exp. · 2012 · 20 · 625810.1364/OE.20.006258 ↗