Influence of thermal agitation on the electric field induced precessional magnetization reversal with perpendicular easy axis
Source abstract
Abstract
We investigated the influence of thermal agitation on the electric field induced precessional magnetization switching probability with perpendicular easy axis by solving the Fokker-Planck equation numerically with finite difference method. The calculated results show that the thermal agitation during the reversal process crucially influences the switching probability. The switching probability can be achieved is only determined by the thermal stability factor Δ of the free layer, it is independent on the device dimension, which is important for the high density device application. Ultra-low error rate down to the order of 10−9 can be achieved for the device of thermal stability factor Δ of 40. Low damping factor α material should be used for the free layer for high reliability device applications. These results exhibit potential of electric field induced precessional magnetization switching with perpendicular easy axis for ultra-low power, high speed and high density magnetic random access memory (MRAM) applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University Institute of Microelectronics, , Beijing 100084, P. R. China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2007 · 315 · 34910.1126/science.1136629 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 13720110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.137201 ↗
3. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2009 · 4 · 15810.1038/nnano.2008.406 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Express · 2009 · 2 · 06300110.1143/APEX.2.063001 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 24720310.1103/PhysRevLett.102.247203 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 18720110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.187201 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 22250410.1063/1.3443658 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 21250310.1063/1.3429592 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 14251210.1063/1.3385732 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 02250610.1063/1.3279157 ↗
11. Nat. Phys. · 2012 · 8 · 49110.1038/nphys2298 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 19720310.1103/PhysRevLett.108.197203 ↗
13. Nature Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 3910.1038/nmat3172 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 12240310.1063/1.4753816 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 10240610.1063/1.4751035 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 07240810.1063/1.4818676 ↗
17. Nat. Mater. · 2004 · 3 · 86210.1038/nmat1256 ↗
18. Nat. Mater. · 2004 · 3 · 86810.1038/nmat1257 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 14240610.1063/1.4756787 ↗
20. IEEE. Magn. Lett. · 2011 · 2 · 300020410.1109/LMAG.2011.2155625 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. · 1963 · 130 · 167710.1103/PhysRev.130.1677 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 1973 · 7 · 110310.1103/PhysRevB.7.1103 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 1594710.1103/PhysRevB.51.15947 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 08830210.1103/PhysRevLett.92.088302 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 13441610.1103/PhysRevB.69.134416 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 18040510.1103/PhysRevB.72.180405 ↗
27. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 09A50110.1063/1.2668365 ↗