Effects of relativity for atomization and isomerization energies of seaborgium carbonyl SgCO and seaborgium isocarbonyl SgOC: Relativity predicts SgOC to be more stable than SgCO
Source abstract
Abstract
Our ab initio all-electron fully relativistic Dirac-Fock (DF) and nonrelativistic Hartree-Fock (NR) calculations for seaborgium isocarbonyl SgOC predict atomization energy (AE) of 13.04 and 11.05 eV, respectively. However, the corresponding DF and NR atomization energies for the seaborgium carbonyl SgCO are predicted as 12.75 and 12.45 eV, respectively. This is the first such result in Chemistry where an isocarbonyl (and especially for a system of superheavy element Sg) is predicted to be more stable at the DF level of theory than the corresponding carbonyl. The predicted energy for the formation of the carbonyl SgCO at the relativistic DF and NR levels of theory is -54.90 and -50.95 kJ /mol, whereas the corresponding energy of formation of the isocarbonyl SgOC is -64.44 and -18.64 kJ/mol, respectively. Ours are the first results of relativistic effects for isomerization and atomization energies of the superheavy seaborgium isocarbonyl SgOC and its isomer SgCO.The formation of isocarbonyl SgOC, should be favored over the carbonyl isomer SgCO in the first step of the reaction Sg+CO →SgOC.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University Department of Chemistry, , Burnaby, B.C; Canada V5A 1S6
Funding
US Department of Energy
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 2006
2. J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem.Lett. · 1996 · 212 · 3110.1007/BF02165448 ↗
3. Radiochemistry · 2002 · 44 · 34210.1023/A:1020612624930 ↗
4. Lecture Notes.Phys. · 2009 · 764 · 20310.1007/978-3-540-85839-3_6 ↗
5. Radiochimica Acta · 2011 · 99 · 51510.1524/ract.2011.1852 ↗
6. Phys.Rev.Letters. · 2010 · 104 · 14250210.1103/PhysRevLett.104.142502 ↗
7. 2010
8. 2010
9. Malli · 1994 · 110.1007/978-1-4899-1340-1 ↗
10. 197
11. Brandas · 2004 · 32310.1007/978-94-017-0448-9 ↗
12. J.Chem.Phys. · 2006 · 124 · 07110210.1063/1.2173233 ↗
13. Theor.chem.Acc · 2007 · 118 · 47310.1007/s00214-007-0335-1 ↗
14. Polyhedron · 2012 · 39 · 11310.1016/j.poly.2012.03.032 ↗
15. J.Chem.Phys. · 2015 · 142 · 06431110.1063/1.4907595 ↗
16. Science · 2014 · 345 · 149110.1126/science.1255720 ↗
17. Science · 2014 · 345 · 145110.1126/science.1259349 ↗
18. J.Chem.Phys. · 1984 · 81 · 191010.1063/1.447865 ↗
19. At.Data.Nucl Data Tables. · 1997 · 67 · 20710.1006/adnd.1997.0751 ↗
20. Acc. Chem. Res. · 1993 · 26 · 62810.1021/ar00036a004 ↗
21. J.Chem.Soc. Chem.Commun · 1993 · 170910.1039/c39930001709 ↗
22. Organometallics · 1996 · 15 · 10510.1021/om950697a ↗
23. Organometallics · 1998 · 17 · 35310.1021/om9705822 ↗
24. Chem. Rev. · 2000 · 100 · 71710.1021/cr980401l ↗
25. 2010
26. J.Phys.Chem A107 · 2003 · 99010.1021/jp026978v ↗