Adsorption of metal atoms at a buckled graphene grain boundary using model potentials
Source abstract
Abstract
Two model potentials have been evaluated with regard to their ability to model adsorption of single metal atoms on a buckled graphene grain boundary. One of the potentials is a Lennard-Jones potential parametrized for gold and carbon, while the other is a bond-order potential parametrized for the interaction between carbon and platinum. Metals are expected to adsorb more strongly to grain boundaries than to pristine graphene due to their enhanced adsorption at point defects resembling those that constitute the grain boundary. Of the two potentials considered here, only the bond-order potential reproduces this behavior and predicts the energy of the adsorbate to be about 0.8 eV lower at the grain boundary than on pristine graphene. The Lennard-Jones potential predicts no significant difference in energy between adsorbates at the boundary and on pristine graphene. These results indicate that the Lennard-Jones potential is not suitable for studies of metal adsorption on defects in graphene, and that bond-order potentials are preferable.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Thermal properties of materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chalmers University of Technology Department of Applied Physics, , SE-412 96, Göteborg, Sweden
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2009 · 324 · 153010.1126/science.1158877 ↗
2. Nature · 2011 · 469 · 38910.1038/nature09718 ↗
3. ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 214210.1021/nn1033423 ↗
4. Nature Nanotechnology · 2014 · 9 · 75510.1038/nnano.2014.166 ↗
5. Nano Lett · 2008 · 8 · 56510.1021/nl0728874 ↗
6. Phys Rev B · 2011 · 84 · 16542310.1103/PhysRevB.84.165423 ↗
7. Carbon · 2011 · 49 · 230610.1016/j.carbon.2011.01.063 ↗
8. Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 493710.1021/nl402902q ↗
9. Advanced Materials · 2014 · 26 · 507910.1002/adma.201401389 ↗
10. Phys Rev B · 1988 · 37 · 699110.1103/PhysRevB.37.6991 ↗
11. Phys Rev Lett · 1988 · 61 · 287910.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2879 ↗
12. Physical Review B · 2002 · 65 · 19512410.1103/PhysRevB.65.195124 ↗
13. Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 13560210.1088/0957-4484/20/13/135602 ↗
14. Advanced Materials · 2013 · 25 · 688410.1002/adma.201303362 ↗
15. Physical Review Letters · 1999 · 82 · 383510.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3835 ↗
16. J Phys: Condens. Matter · 2011 · 23 · 39500110.1088/0953-8984/23/39/395001 ↗
17. Surface Science · 2010 · 604 · 14410.1016/j.susc.2009.11.001 ↗
18. Chemical Physics Letters · 2006 · 420 · 38210.1016/j.cplett.2006.01.007 ↗
19. Comp. Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 81 · 34810.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.032 ↗
20. J. Phys: Cond. Mat. · 2009 · 21 · 48550610.1088/0953-8984/21/48/485506 ↗
21. Chem. Phys. Chem. · 2013 · 14 · 348310.1002/cphc.201300563 ↗
22. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 2178010.1021/jp304861d ↗
23. Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2014 · 118 · 890710.1021/jp410775n ↗
24. Chemical Physics Letters · 2006 · 432 · 21310.1016/j.cplett.2006.10.063 ↗
25. J Comput Phys · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
26. Phys Rev B · 2010 · 81 · 20544110.1103/PhysRevB.81.205441 ↗
27. Physical Review B · 1990 · 42 · 945810.1103/PhysRevB.42.9458 ↗
28. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · 2002 · 14 · 78310.1088/0953-8984/14/4/312 ↗
29. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 654310.1021/jp2110117 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 04541610.1103/PhysRevB.90.045416 ↗
31. J Mol Graphics · 1996 · 14 · 3310.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗