Radial phononic thermal conductance in thin membranes in the Casimir limit: Design guidelines for devices
Source abstract
Abstract
In a previous publication [I. J. Maasilta, AIP Advances 1, 041704 (2011)], we discussed the formalism and some computational results for phononic thermal conduction in the suspended membrane geometry for radial heat flow from a central source, which is a common geometry for some low-temperature detectors, for example. We studied the case where only diffusive surface scattering is present, the so called Casimir limit, which can be experimentally relevant at temperatures below ∼ 10 K in typical materials, and even higher for ultrathin samples. Here, we extend our studies to much thinner membranes, obtaining numerical results for geometries which are more typical in experiments. In addition, we interpret the results in terms of the small signal and differential thermal conductance, so that guidelines for designing devices, such as low-temperature bolometric detectors, are more easily obtained. Scaling with membrane dimensions is shown to differ significantly from the bulk scattering, and, in particular, thinning the membrane is shown to lead to a much stronger reduction in thermal conductance than what one would envision from the simplest bulk formulas.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Jyväskylä, P. O. Box 35, FIN-40014 Jyväskylä Nanoscience Center, Department of Physics, , Finland
Funding
Suomen Akatemia
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 1976
2. Physica · 1938 · 5 · 595
3. 1960
4. 2011
5. J. Heat Transfer · 1963 · 85C · 5510.1115/1.3686010 ↗
6. J. Heat Transfer · 1986 · 108 · 27110.1115/1.3246915 ↗
7. Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 164010.1038/ncomms2630 ↗
8. Proc. Roy. Soc. A · 1953 · 220 · 17110.1098/rspa.1953.0180 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 1970 · 2 · 407710.1103/PhysRevB.2.4077 ↗
10. J. Phys. C · 1984 · 17 · L60710.1088/0022-3719/17/23/004 ↗
11. J. Phys. C · 1985 · 18 · 522510.1088/0022-3719/18/26/030 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 05430410.1103/PhysRevB.85.054304 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 38 · 757610.1103/PhysRevB.38.7576 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 16550210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.165502 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 04530210.1103/PhysRevB.66.045302 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 70 · 268710.1063/1.118994 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 293410.1063/1.1616981 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 01610410.1063/1.2400093 ↗
19. Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 186110.1021/nl803844j ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 12450810.1063/1.4869737 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 06450610.1063/1.4893019 ↗
22. Enss · 200510.1007/b12169 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 03451510.1063/1.4745908 ↗
24. Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 343510.1038/ncomms4435 ↗
25. Chin. Journal Phys. · 2011 · 49 · 435
26. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 25190310.1063/1.1949269 ↗
27. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 38 · 225010.1063/1.121269 ↗
28. AIP Advances · 2011 · 1 · 04170410.1063/1.3675925 ↗
29. Ann. Physik · 1995 · 4 · 910.1002/andp.19955070103 ↗
30. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 70 · 130510.1063/1.120979 ↗
31. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 201410.1109/TASC.2014.2366641 ↗
32. 1998 · 83
33. 1992
34. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 23310810.1063/1.3152772 ↗
35. Proc. SPIE · 2006 · 6275 · 62750810.1117/12.672036 ↗
36. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 08450710.1063/1.3561432 ↗
37. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 49610.1038/nnano.2008.173 ↗
38. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 06450510.1103/PhysRevB.90.064505 ↗