journal article·2014-09-01Open access

Is electrospray emission really due to columbic forces?

Francesco Aliotta, Pietro Calandra, Mikolaj Pochylski, Rosina C. Ponterio, Gabriele Salvato, Cirino Vasi

AIP Advances· Volume 4· Issue 9

Abstract

Electrospray ionization (ESI) is a widely adopted soft ionization method for mass spectroscopy (MS). In spite of the undeniable success of the technique, its mechanisms are difficult to be analytically modelled because the process is characterized by non-equilibrium conditions. The common belief is that the formation of gas-phase ions takes place at the apex of the Taylor cone via electrophoretic charging. The charge balance implies that a conversion of electrons to ions should occur at the metal-liquid interface of the injector needle. We have detected that the above description is based on unproved assumptions which are not consistent with the correct evaluation of the problem. The comparison between experiments performed under the usual geometry and observations obtained under symmetric field configurations suggests that the emitted droplets cannot be significantly charged or, at least, that any possible ionization mechanism is so poorly efficient to ensure that columbic forces cannot play a major role in jet formation, even in cases where the liquid consists of a solution of ionic species. Further work is required to clearly understand how ionization occurs in ESI-MS.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CNR-Istituto per i Processi Chimico-Fisici 1 , Viale F. Stagno d’Alcontres 37, I-98158 Messina, Italy

CNR-Istituto per lo Studio dei Materiali Nanostrutturati 2 , via dei Taurini 19, I-00185 Roma, Italy

Adam Mickiewicz University 3 , Faculty of Physics, Umultowska 85, PL-62614 Poznan, Poland

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Philos. Mag. · 1912 · 23 · 14810.1080/14786440108637208 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. · 1917 · 10 · 110.1103/PhysRev.10.1 ↗
3. J. Appl. Phys. · 1958 · 29 · 118210.1063/1.1723398 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 1961 · 32 · 178410.1063/1.1728439 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 1961 · 32 · 178410.1063/1.1728440 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 1959 · 30 · 98410.1063/1.1777003 ↗
7. Proc. Royal Soc. London · 1964 · A280 · 38310.1098/rspa.1964.0151 ↗
8. J. Chem. Phys. · 1976 · 64 · 228710.1063/1.432536 ↗
9. J. Chem. Phys. · 1968 · 49 · 224010.1063/1.1670391 ↗
10. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2004 · 6 · 305610.1039/b316836k ↗
11. J. Phys. Chem. · 1984 · 84 · 445110.1021/j150664a002 ↗
12. Anal. Chem. · 1985 · 57 · 67510.1021/ac00280a023 ↗
13. DokladyAkademiiNauk SSSR (in Russian) · 1984 · 277 · 379
14. J. Phys. Chem. · 1988 · 92 · 54610.1021/j100313a058 ↗
15. Science · 1988 · 246 · 6410.1126/science.2675315 ↗
16. Anal. Chem. · 1991 · 63 · 210910.1021/ac00019a009 ↗
17. 1999 · 165
18. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 40 · 611210.1088/0022-3727/40/19/052 ↗
19. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 06550210.1088/0022-3727/42/6/065502 ↗
20. J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 133 · 08110410.1063/1.3483690 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. E · 2013 · 88 · 03301910.1103/PhysRevE.88.033019 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. E · 2012 · 86 · 06631710.1103/PhysRevE.86.066317 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. E · 2009 · 79 · 06630510.1103/PhysRevE.79.066305 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. E · 2012 · 86 · 02630510.1103/PhysRevE.86.026305 ↗
25. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. · 2007 · 18 · 73710.1016/j.jasms.2006.11.012 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 0761210.1063/1.3702438 ↗
27. Proc. R. Soc. · 2012 · A468 · 282910.1098/rspa.2012.0133 ↗
28. See supplementary material as http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4894800 for a further example, not reported in the main figures.
29. Physics of fluids · 2012 · 24 · 03210510.1063/1.3691655 ↗