Synthesis of β-Ga2O3 nanowires on sapphire substrates using pulsed laser deposition with metal catalysts
Source abstract
Abstract
Using the pulsed laser deposition method, we investigated the fabrication and properties of β-Ga2O3 nanowires on sapphire substrates with various metal catalysts. Although most previous research has focused on growing Ga2O3 nanowires using Au and Ag catalysts, there has been limited investigation into other metal catalysts. Under the growth conditions employed in this study, β-Ga2O3 nanowires were successfully grown on sapphire substrates using Au, Ag, Cu, Ni, and Ti catalysts. The morphology and growth rates of the nanowires varied significantly depending on the type of metal catalyst and substrate. For Au, Ag, and Cu catalysts, the primary growth mechanism of the β-Ga2O3 nanowires was identified as the vapor–liquid–solid process, whereas for Ni and Ti catalysts, growth was predominantly governed by the vapor–solid mechanism. In contrast, under identical growth conditions, metals such as Sn and Cr failed to act as effective catalysts for nanowire growth due to their inability to sustain catalytic activity at the given temperature. Furthermore, the optical properties of the β-Ga2O3 nanowires were found to vary with the type of catalyst used. This study elucidates the correlation between the feasibility of nanowire growth, the resulting nanowire characteristics, and the properties of the metal catalysts, such as their melting points and eutectic points with Ga, through analysis of the phase diagram.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ga2O3 and related materials · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Photocathodes and Microchannel Plates
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering, Pusan National University , Busan 46241,
Funding
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 01350410.1063/1.3674287 ↗
2. Sens. Actuators, B · 2012 · 161 · 22310.1016/j.snb.2011.10.023 ↗
3. Solid State Sci. · 2012 · 14 · 97110.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.04.037 ↗
4. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 39 · L52410.1143/jjap.39.l524 ↗
5. Kyzas · 201810.5772/intechopen.70149 ↗
6. Science · 1997 · 277 · 197110.1126/science.277.5334.1971 ↗
7. Science · 2001 · 291 · 194710.1126/science.1058120 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 109610.1063/1.1554477 ↗
9. Science · 2001 · 292 · 189710.1126/science.1060367 ↗
10. Science · 2001 · 293 · 128910.1126/science.1062711 ↗
11. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2006 · 10 · 18210.1016/j.cossms.2007.03.002 ↗
12. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 543610.1021/ja8011353 ↗
13. Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 399610.1021/nl400637w ↗
14. Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 183 · 14510.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.08.012 ↗
15. Sensors · 2022 · 22 · 204810.3390/s22052048 ↗
16. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 303610.1021/jp3093989 ↗
17. Acta Cryst. · 1974 · A30 · 84410.1107/S0567739474001951 ↗
18. J. Less-Common Met. · 1966 · 10 · 4210.1016/0022-5088(66)90044-0 ↗
19. Acta Cryst. · 1974 · B30 · 291010.1107/S0567740874008478 ↗
20. J. Phase Equilib. · 1995 · 16 · 50810.1007/bf02646720 ↗
21. 1985 · 327
22. 2012 · 2
23. 2011 · 156
24. J. Less-Common Met. · 1964 · 7 · 34710.1016/0022-5088(64)90079-7 ↗
25. J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. · 2007 · 28 · 30110.1007/s11669-007-9056-3 ↗
26. Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 3596410.1038/srep35964 ↗
27. J. Solid State Chem. · 1982 · 45 · 18010.1016/0022-4596(82)90274-2 ↗
28. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 98 · 09431210.1063/1.2128044 ↗
29. Phys. Status Solidi RRL · 2013 · 7 · 78110.1002/pssr.201307253 ↗
30. J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1998 · 59 · 124110.1016/s0022-3697(98)00047-x ↗
31. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 03431510.1063/1.3620986 ↗
32. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 11311210.1063/1.1883713 ↗
33. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 20191410.1063/1.2910768 ↗
34. J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1978 · 39 · 67510.1016/0022-3697(78)90183-x ↗