Optimization design of electrode grid lines for busbar-less solar cells
Source abstract
Abstract
The electrode grid lines are a critical component of solar cells, where power loss caused by grid shading and associated resistance significantly impacts cell performance. We establish a power loss model for busbar-less solar cells to optimize the parameters and layout of grid lines, and analyze the influence of grid number, width, and mesh density on the power loss. A comparative evaluation of conversion efficiency was conducted between two types of busbar-less solar cells, namely, pin-up module (PUM) and side-point module (SPM), and conventional H-pattern solar cells. The simulation results demonstrate that busbar-less solar cells exhibit superior performance compared to H-pattern cells: the PUM design achieves absolute efficiency improvements of 1.66% and 1.65% for its two layout conditions, and the SPM design shows a 1.64% enhancement. Furthermore, for a larger mesh unit, the PUM design exhibits a distinct advantage over the SPM in achieving higher efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: solar cell performance optimization · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering, Xinjiang University 1 , Urumqi 830047,
Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Precision Equipment and Manufacturing Technique, South China University of Technology 2 , Guangzhou 510641,
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region · Guangdong Key Laboratory of Precision Equipment and Manufacturing Technology · Xinjiang University Outstanding Graduate Student Innovation Project · Tianchi Program
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Energy: An overview of type, form, storage, advantages, efficiency, and their impact10.1002/ese3.1937 ↗
2. Bio-hydrogen as an unrivaled emergent candidate for renewable, sustainable, clean, and high energy: A narrative review toward contemporary and prognostic technovations10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.018 ↗
3. Comparative analysis of the impacts of solar, wind, biofuels and hydropower on load capacity factor and sustainable development index10.1016/j.energy.2025.134991 ↗
4. Globally interconnected solar-wind system addresses future electricity demands10.1038/s41467-025-59879-9 ↗
5. Sustainable development perspectives of solar energy technologies with focus on solar photovoltaic—A review10.3390/en15082790 ↗
6. Solar energy technology and its roles in sustainable development10.1093/ce/zkac023 ↗
7. Solar energy for future world: —A review10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.022 ↗
8. A review of solar photovoltaic technologies: Developments, challenges, and future perspectives10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101057 ↗
9. Mitigating the solar PV landscape: A comprehensive review of challenges and innovations10.1007/s42341-025-00616-w ↗
10. Comparative analysis of direct coupling and MPPT control in standalone PV systems for solar energy optimization to meet sustainable building energy demands10.1038/s41598-024-72606-6 ↗
11. Rooftop photovoltaic solar panels warm up and cool down cities10.1038/s44284-024-00137-2 ↗
12. Photovoltaic materials: Present efficiencies and future challenges10.1126/science.aad4424 ↗
13. The state of the art in photovoltaic materials and device research10.1038/s41578-025-00784-4 ↗
14. Numerical optimization of lead-based and lead-free absorber materials for perovskite solar cell (PSC) architectures: A SCAPS-1D simulation10.1063/5.0217486 ↗
15. Optimizing the manufacturing process to increase fill factor and elevate efficiency of n-type crystalline silicon TOPCon solar cells10.1063/5.0270347 ↗
16. 20%-efficient polycrystalline Cd(Se,Te) thin-film solar cells with compositional gradient near the front junction10.1038/s41467-022-35442-8 ↗
17. 27.09%-efficiency silicon heterojunction back contact solar cell and going beyond10.1038/s41467-024-53275-5 ↗
18. Interface passivation for 31.25%-efficient perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells10.1126/science.adg0091 ↗
19. Progress of organic photovoltaics towards 20% efficiency10.1038/s44287-024-00080-3 ↗
20. Highly efficient (31%) of rubidium-based halide perovskite solar cell using SCAPS-1D simulation10.1063/5.0251323 ↗
21. Enhancing solar cell efficiency: Investigation of high-performance lead-based perovskite-on-silicon (PVK–Si) tandem solar cells through design and numerical analysis10.1063/5.0175914 ↗
22. Optimal design of front-contact metallization for photovoltaic solar cells10.1016/0038-1101(81)90215-x ↗
23. Macroscopic nonuniformities in metal grids formed by cracked film lithography result in 19.3% efficient solar cells10.1021/acsami.0c04958 ↗
24. Effects of screen printing and sintering processing of front side silver grid line on the electrical performances of multi-crystalline silicon solar cells10.1007/s10854-017-7003-6 ↗
25. 18.4% efficient grid optimized cells with 100-Ω/sq emitter10.1109/jphotov.2012.2226143 ↗
26. Optimizing front grid electrodes of flexible CIGS thin film solar cells with different shapes10.1016/j.solener.2024.113076 ↗
27. Efficiency loss prevention in monolithically integrated thin film solar cells by improved front contact10.1002/pip.2459 ↗
28. A mathematical investigation of the impact of gridline and busbar patterns on commercial silicon solar cell performance10.1007/s10825-020-01455-z ↗
29. Optimization design of a multibusbar structure: The using of a conductive Belt10.1155/2018/7630390 ↗
30. Broadband solar cell absorber configurations design with front/rear surface gain resonance through the employment of dimensions and tapering of single/tabbed solar cell grid elements10.1007/s12596-025-02712-9 ↗
31. An optimized metal grid design to improve the solar cell performance under solar concentration using multiobjective computation10.1016/j.mseb.2012.11.006 ↗
32. Minimization of the effect of the collecting grid in a solar cell based silicon10.1016/j.solmat.2004.07.038 ↗
33. Influence of metal grid patterns on the performance of silicon solar cells at different illumination levels10.1016/j.mseb.2008.10.004 ↗
34. Assessing current-voltage measurements of busbarless solar cells10.1016/j.solmat.2022.111988 ↗
35. Busbar-free electrode patterns of crystalline silicon solar cells for high density shingled photovoltaic module10.1016/j.solmat.2022.111802 ↗
36. Multi-wire interconnection of Busbar-free solar cells10.1016/j.egypro.2014.08.109 ↗
37. Multi-wire interconnection of busbarless solar cells with embedded electrode sheet10.3390/en14134035 ↗
38. Research progress of zero-busbar technology based on heterojunction photovoltaic modules10.3390/app142310845 ↗
39. Solar cell efficiency improvement by new metallization techniques—The Day4 electrode concept
40. How to achieve 17% cell efficiencies on large back-contacted mc-Si solar cells
41. Pattern transfer printing (PTPTM) for c-Si solar cell metallization10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.299 ↗